Superabsorbent Polymer Classification Under Reduced Pressure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional classification processes for superabsorbent polymer particles face issues such as blockage of screen surfaces, deterioration in classification efficiency, caking tendencies leading to agglomerates, and insufficient separation efficiency, particularly in continuous production processes.

Innovation Solution

A classification process using a screen machine under reduced pressure, where the pressure above the uppermost sieve is from 0 to 4.0mbar higher than below the undermost sieve, with multiple screens and a gas stream to improve separation efficiency and prevent particle sticking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional screening machines are used to classify superabsorbent polymer particles, then classification is performed, but screen surface blockage occurs and classification efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification efficiencyVSAvoidscreen surface blockage
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by operating the screening machine under reduced pressure conditions (vacuum). This changes the physical environment parameters affecting particle behavior on the screen surface, preventing caking and blockage while maintaining effective classification. The reduced pressure alters the flow characteristics and adhesion properties of the polymer particles, resolving the contradiction between classification efficiency and screen blockage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If screening is performed under conventional pressure conditions, then particles are classified, but caking tendencies lead to agglomerates and insufficient separation efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidcaking tendency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pressure parameter from atmospheric to reduced pressure conditions. This parameter change prevents caking tendencies by reducing particle-particle adhesion forces and maintaining particle flowability. The reduced pressure environment prevents agglomerate formation while enabling effective separation based on particle size, thus improving separation efficiency without compromising particle stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If additives are added to improve free flow and prevent adhesion, then particle flow improves, but product purity decreases due to additional substances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefree flowVSAvoidproduct purity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs pneumatic principles by using reduced pressure (vacuum) to improve particle free flow and prevent adhesion. Instead of adding chemical additives, the system uses pressure differential to control particle behavior on the screen surface. The vacuum condition reduces interparticle forces and enhances flow characteristics, achieving the desired ease of operation while maintaining product purity without contamination from additives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Productivity

If continuous production is maintained, then productivity is high, but disruptions occur due to screen blockage and production shutdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous productionVSAvoidproduction disruptions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements parameter changes by maintaining reduced pressure conditions throughout the screening process. This continuous vacuum environment prevents screen blockage and caking that would otherwise cause production disruptions. The stable pressure parameter ensures consistent particle flow and screen performance, enabling uninterrupted continuous production while maintaining high productivity without reliability issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process enhances the separation efficiency of superabsorbent polymer particles, reduces the occurrence of agglomerates, and maintains high throughput without the need for additional additives, thereby ensuring continuous and efficient production.

Implementation Method 1

the pressure above the uppermost sieve is from 0 to 4.0mbar per sieve higher than below the undermost sieve

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure gradient: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

with multiple screens and a gas stream to improve separation efficiency and prevent particle sticking

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas flow: Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3661662B1Classification process for superabsorbent polymer particles
Publication Date: 2024.09.11 BASF SE

AI summary

The invention relates to a classification process for superabsorbent polymer particles, comprising classifying the water-absorbent polymer particles in a screen machine under reduced pressure wherein the pressure above the uppermost sieve is from 0 to 4.0mbar per sieve higher than below the undermost sieve.