Service Admission Path Control for Network QoS

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing service admission control mechanisms in communication networks do not effectively manage end-to-end Quality of Service (QoS) by ignoring physical link capacities, topologies, and routing schemas, leading to congestion and degradation of real-time services like VoIP, video, and circuit emulation.

Innovation Solution

A Service Admission Path Control (SAPC) mechanism that aligns with lower layer topologies and capacities, using a decentralized architecture to control service admission based on network, link, and partitioning topologies, incorporating a service routing mechanism, precedence and pre-emption, and hop counting to ensure efficient bandwidth allocation and service prioritization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing CAC mechanisms are used at the application layer, then call connections are limited and CPU overload is avoided, but end-to-end QoS cannot be controlled according to low layer topology and capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS controlVSAvoidadmission control mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the admission control function into multiple hierarchical levels: network-level CAC, link-level CAC, and application-level CAC. Each level operates independently with its own thresholds and policies, allowing QoS control at different granularities without requiring a single complex monolithic system. This segmentation enables end-to-end QoS control while maintaining manageable complexity at each layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism that bridges the application layer and low layers (physical and data link layers). This intermediary translates high-level QoS requirements into low-layer admission control parameters and vice versa, enabling coordinated QoS control across layers without direct coupling between application layer and physical infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If CAC thresholds are allocated per Call-control machine, then CPU power is protected, but physical link capacities and topologies are not considered

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCPU protectionVSAvoidtopology awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements local quality by allocating CAC thresholds at multiple granularities: per Call-control machine for CPU protection, per physical link for capacity management, and per network path for topology-aware routing. Each threshold is optimized for its specific location and function, allowing the system to simultaneously protect CPU resources while adapting to physical link capacities and topologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds dimensional depth to admission control by introducing hierarchical levels (network, link, application) and spatial dimensions (multiple paths, topologies). Instead of a single flat CAC threshold, the system operates in a multi-dimensional space where thresholds can be set independently for different machines, links, and paths, enabling both CPU protection and topology awareness simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If multiple CAC mechanisms are deployed at different layers, then comprehensive QoS control is achieved, but system complexity and coordination overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveend-to-end QoSVSAvoidmulti-layer control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where each CAC level monitors its local conditions (CPU load, link utilization, queue depth) and adjusts its thresholds dynamically. Higher-level CAC mechanisms receive feedback from lower levels about actual resource availability, and lower levels receive guidance from higher levels about QoS priorities. This coordinated feedback loop achieves end-to-end QoS control while preventing conflicting decisions that would increase complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9025447B2Service admission path control (SAPC)
Publication Date: 2015.05.05 AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE SAS
  • US9025447B2 patent drawing
  • US9025447B2 patent drawing
  • US9025447B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A service admission control method in a communication network comprising at least one group of at least one node per group, the method comprising the steps: Receive a service establishment attempt from one group; and admit the service in the network depending on the granularity of the network topology, the link topology and/or the partitioning of the link topology.