Sapphire Coated Gemstone Simulant Hardness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing diamond simulants like cubic zirconia lack durability and optical similarity to diamonds, leading to consumer reluctance due to differences in hardness, refractive index, and dispersion values, as well as brittleness and distinct visual reflections.

Innovation Solution

A diamond simulant composed of yttrium and zirconia with a sapphire or Al2O3 coating applied to enhance hardness and optical properties, mimicking those of diamonds, using techniques like ion beam assisted deposition for uniform coating.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If cubic zirconia is used as a diamond simulant, then cost is reduced and visual appearance is similar, but hardness and durability are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovehardnessVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies composite materials by combining cubic zirconia core with a sapphire (Al2O3) coating layer. The cubic zirconia provides the base optical properties and diamond-like appearance, while the sapphire coating enhances surface hardness and durability. This composite structure resolves the contradiction by achieving diamond-like hardness (10 on Mohs scale) through the sapphire coating while maintaining the cost-effectiveness and visual similarity of cubic zirconia.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the surface parameter of the simulant by applying a coating with different physical properties. The sapphire coating has a refractive index of 1.76, which is lower than cubic zirconia's 2.2, creating an optical gradient that reduces rainbow reflections. This parameter change in refractive index and hardness at the surface level resolves the contradiction between maintaining visual similarity and improving durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If cubic zirconia is used as a diamond simulant, then cost is reduced, but optical properties such as refractive index and dispersion differ from diamond

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical similarityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a composite structure with cubic zirconia core and sapphire coating to optimize optical properties. The cubic zirconia core provides high refractive index (2.2) for diamond-like brilliance, while the sapphire coating with lower refractive index (1.76) reduces unwanted rainbow reflections and improves overall optical similarity to diamond. This layered composite approach resolves the contradiction by achieving superior optical fidelity without requiring complete material replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by having different materials serve different functions: the cubic zirconia core handles the primary light refraction and brilliance, while the sapphire coating specifically addresses surface optical quality by reducing rainbow reflections. This localized functional differentiation resolves the optical similarity contradiction without compromising overall manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If a sapphire coating is applied to enhance hardness, then durability is improved, but manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface hardnessVSAvoidcoating process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical coating methods with ion beam assisted deposition (IBAD), a physical vapor deposition technique. This substitution allows for precise control of coating thickness and composition, ensures uniform coverage, and creates strong adhesion between the sapphire coating and cubic zirconia core. The IBAD process resolves the manufacturing complexity contradiction by providing a controlled, repeatable method that achieves diamond-like hardness while maintaining process efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The resulting simulant exhibits improved durability and visual similarity to diamonds, with enhanced hardness and refractive index, making it more appealing as a cost-effective alternative.

Implementation Method 1

using techniques like ion beam assisted deposition for uniform coating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIon beam assisted deposition: Ion Beam

Data Source

PatentUS9055792B2Sapphire coated gemstone
Publication Date: 2015.06.16 LAUTREC
  • US9055792B2 patent drawing
  • US9055792B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a diamond simulant with greater similarity to a diamond than cubic zirconia. The present invention further provides a diamond simulant with durability, hardness, and optical features closer to that of a genuine diamond that previously afforded by other diamond simulants, such as cubic zirconia.