Automated SAR Beam Layout for Mapping Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beam layout technologies, such as strip mode and scan mode synthetic aperture radar (SAR), are inefficient due to constraints in aircraft speed, Doppler bandwidth, and lack of flexibility in achieving equal resolution along dimensions and prioritizing areas for imaging.

Innovation Solution

An automated beam layout system that generates boundary positions based on mapping priority, direction, and speed of the beam platform, allowing for adaptive and efficient beam placement to maximize area coverage and resource allocation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If strip mode SAR or scan mode SAR is used, then area mapping is achieved, but efficiency is reduced due to aircraft speed constraints and extra radar bandwidth requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemapping efficiencyVSAvoidradar bandwidth requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the beam pointing direction adjustable and controllable rather than fixed. The radar beam platform can dynamically change its pointing direction to follow area priority and optimize mapping efficiency, resolving the contradiction between mapping efficiency and radar bandwidth requirements by adapting to different operational conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of beam pointing direction from fixed to variable, allowing optimization of both mapping efficiency and radar bandwidth usage. By adjusting the pointing direction parameter based on area priority and platform position, the system achieves efficient mapping without requiring excessive radar bandwidth

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If strip mode SAR or scan mode SAR is used, then area mapping is achieved, but flexibility to follow area priority is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility to follow area priorityVSAvoidbeam layout complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-determining area priority before beam mapping. The system identifies and prioritizes areas of interest in advance, then allocates beam resources accordingly, enabling flexible adaptation to area priority without requiring complex real-time adjustments during mapping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated beam layout system performs self-service by automatically determining optimal beam positions and pointing directions based on area priority and platform characteristics. This automation eliminates the need for manual beam layout planning while achieving flexible adaptation to area priority, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If equal resolution along each dimension is achieved, then mapping quality is improved, but aircraft speed constraints and extra radar bandwidth are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage resolutionVSAvoidaircraft speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by allowing different beam pointing directions and parameters for different areas of the mapping region. High-priority areas can receive optimized beam configurations for high resolution, while other areas use standard configurations, achieving overall mapping quality without requiring uniform high resolution everywhere that would constrain aircraft speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8552905B2Automated layout of beams
Publication Date: 2013.10.08 RAYTHEON CO
  • US8552905B2 patent drawing
  • US8552905B2 patent drawing
  • US8552905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology described herein includes a system and/or a method of automated layout of beams. The method includes generating a plurality of boundary positions along boundaries of an image frame. The method further includes determining a start location for a first beam within the plurality of boundary positions based on at least one of a mapping priority, direction of movement of a beam platform, and speed of movement of the beam platform. The method further includes modifying the plurality of boundary positions based on the start location. The method further includes determining a second location for a second beam within the modified plurality of boundary positions based on at least one of a mapping priority, direction of movement of a beam platform, and speed of movement of the beam platform. The method further includes modifying the modified plurality of boundary positions based on the second location.