Ground-Based SAR Secondary Disaster Early Warning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing geological disaster warning methods struggle with accurately identifying and warning of secondary disasters such as landslides and collapses due to false positives, missed reports, and incomplete deformation data, especially in mountainous terrains where geological forces and external actions can lead to sudden and concealed disasters.

Innovation Solution

A secondary disaster warning method based on ground-based SAR monitoring deformation data, which involves real-time monitoring of unstable areas, constructing displacement-time curves, and using displacement change triangular area models to analyze and warn of impending secondary disasters by dividing the disaster development process into initial, constant velocity, and acceleration stages with corresponding warning levels.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If ground-based SAR monitoring equipment is installed in danger zones, then measurement precision of deformation data is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to impracticality of timely installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation data precisionVSAvoidequipment installation timeliness
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-installing ground-based SAR monitoring equipment in potentially dangerous areas before geological disasters occur. This allows the equipment to be ready for immediate data collection when disasters happen, eliminating the need for timely installation during emergency situations while maintaining high measurement precision of deformation data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional three-stage deformation warning models are used, then reliability of warning identification is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to incomplete deformation data in sudden concealed disasters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning identification reliabilityVSAvoiddeformation data completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming the warning identification approach from relying on complete three-stage deformation data to using displacement triangular area parameters that can be effectively calculated from partial deformation data. This parameter transformation allows the system to maintain reliable warning identification even when deformation data is incomplete due to the sudden and concealed nature of secondary geological disasters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If displacement triangular area model is used, then productivity of disaster stage identification is improved, but device complexity increases due to data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisaster stage identification speedVSAvoiddata processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using displacement triangular area as a simplified parameter that can be quickly calculated from deformation monitoring data. This parameter transformation enables rapid identification of disaster development stages without requiring complex analysis systems, thereby improving productivity while keeping the data processing system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If existing warning models are used, then loss of time in warning issuance is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to false positives and missed reports

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning issuance timeVSAvoidwarning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by using displacement triangular area parameters instead of traditional deformation stage parameters. This parameter transformation enables the system to quickly identify disaster stages and issue warnings in real-time while maintaining high reliability by accurately distinguishing between different disaster development stages, thereby reducing both false positives and missed reports.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables more accurate, direct, and effective warnings of secondary geological disasters by comprehensively and rapidly identifying the development stages and deformation evolution trends of unstable areas, ensuring the safety of emergency response personnel.

Implementation Method 1

ground-based SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) monitoring data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSynthetic Aperture Radar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS12277855B1Method for secondary disaster early warning based on ground-based SAR monitoring of deformation data
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 CHENGDU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • US12277855B1 patent drawing
  • US12277855B1 patent drawing
  • US12277855B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A secondary disaster early warning method based on ground-based SAR monitoring of deformation data includes (1) real-time monitoring of a secondary disaster unstable area through ground-based SAR to obtain deformation monitoring data; (2) constructing a displacement-time curve generated by the secondary disaster unstable area over time; setting a monitoring period, and based on the displacement-time curve, constructing a displacement change triangular area model; (3) based on the displacement change triangular area model, constructing an area-time curve, and obtaining the area-time curve change trend and the displacement triangular area in the displacement-time curve according to the monitoring period; (4) dividing the secondary disaster development process into an initial deformation stage, a constant velocity deformation stage, and an accelerated deformation stage; (5) setting early warning levels corresponding to each stage for phased secondary disaster early warning; and (6) quickly and comprehensively identifying the secondary disaster development stage and deformation evolution trend.