SAR Maritime Target Detection via Tile Segmentation and Screening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing complexity and volume of high-resolution synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image data pose challenges in efficiently isolating and classifying small objects of interest, particularly in maritime environments, due to the need for extensive data analysis and potential false positives from background noise.

Innovation Solution

A multi-stage processing system that divides SAR image data into tiles, performs initial and advanced screening to reject non-relevant tiles, generates feature vectors for candidate tiles, and uses a classifier to determine target classification, thereby reducing the information processed and focusing complex analysis on likely target areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high-resolution SAR image data is analyzed in full detail, then detection accuracy improves, but processing time and computational complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the SAR image into multiple tiles or sub-regions, allowing parallel processing of smaller segments rather than analyzing the entire high-resolution image as a single unit. This segmentation maintains detection accuracy within each tile while significantly reducing overall processing time through distributed computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary screening of image tiles using coarse-resolution data or simplified detection algorithms before applying full detailed analysis. This preliminary action identifies candidate regions of interest, ensuring that computationally intensive high-accuracy processing is applied only to relevant areas, thus reducing total processing time while maintaining detection accuracy for actual targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If full SAR image data is processed for small object detection, then detection completeness improves, but computational resources required increase dramatically

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection completenessVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the image into tiles and processing them independently with reduced computational algorithms, the system maintains detection completeness across the entire image while reducing the computational resources required for each individual tile, avoiding the need to allocate excessive resources to process the entire image at full resolution simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial processing to most image tiles (using simplified algorithms or lower resolution) and reserves full computational resources only for tiles identified as containing potential targets. This partial action approach ensures detection completeness by examining all tiles while optimizing computational resource usage by avoiding excessive processing in non-relevant areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If extensive data analysis is performed to identify small maritime targets, then classification accuracy improves, but false positives from background noise increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidfalse positives
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis to establish background noise characteristics and statistical thresholds before conducting detailed target detection. This preliminary action creates reference models of normal background variations, allowing the subsequent detection algorithm to distinguish true targets from noise more effectively, thereby improving classification accuracy while reducing false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results from one tile or iteration inform the processing of subsequent tiles. Statistical information about detected targets and noise patterns is fed back into the classification algorithm, allowing it to adapt and improve its discrimination between real targets and false positives, thus enhancing classification accuracy while minimizing erroneous detections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10235589B2Small maritime target detector
Publication Date: 2019.03.19 JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • US10235589B2 patent drawing
  • US10235589B2 patent drawing
  • US10235589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A detection system may include processing circuitry configured to receive synthetic aperture radar image data that has been or will be divided into a plurality of image tiles and perform initial screening to reject image tiles not having a threshold level of energy. The processing circuitry may be further configured to perform advanced screening to eliminate image tiles based on background noise to generate screened image tiles and generate a feature vector for an energy return of the screened image tiles. The processing circuitry may also be configured to determine a classification of a target associated with the feature vector.