Satellite ADS-B Beamforming to Reduce Message Collisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing satellite-based ADS-B message reception systems face high collision probabilities and require numerous processing modules due to the large number of aircraft within the satellite's field of view, leading to increased satellite volume, mass, and power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A satellite-based ADS-B message reception device with a beamforming module that dynamically adapts beam formation to aircraft density and distribution using combination coefficients, optimizing beam shape and activation duration to reduce collision probability and processing module requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If the satellite uses a wide field of view to cover the entire service area, then the geographical coverage is improved, but the probability of collision between ADS-B messages increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice area coverageVSAvoidmessage collision probability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The satellite divides the wide field of view into multiple narrower beams, each covering a specific spot on the ground. This segmentation allows the system to maintain comprehensive coverage while reducing the number of aircraft simultaneously visible to any single beam, thereby reducing message collision probability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the number, position, and shape of beams based on real-time aircraft density distribution. When aircraft density is high in certain regions, the system increases beam concentration in those areas, optimizing coverage while maintaining low collision probabilities across the entire service area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the satellite forms multiple narrow beams to reduce collision probability, then the message collision probability is reduced, but the number of processing modules required increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemessage collision probabilityVSAvoidnumber of processing modules
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of beams and their characteristics based on aircraft density. In areas with low aircraft density, fewer beams are formed, reducing the number of processing modules needed. In high-density areas, beams are concentrated and optimized, maintaining low collision probabilities without requiring proportional increases in processing capacity across the entire satellite.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes beam parameters (number, width, position, shape) based on aircraft distribution patterns. By adapting these parameters dynamically, the system achieves low collision probabilities with an optimized number of processing modules, rather than using a fixed large number of beams that would be required if uniform coverage were maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the satellite increases the number of processing modules to handle multiple beams, then the ADS-B message reception capability is improved, but the satellite volume, mass, and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveADS-B message reception capabilityVSAvoidsatellite mass
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The satellite employs dynamic beam formation that adapts to aircraft density distribution. This allows the system to maintain high ADS-B message reception capability by concentrating processing resources on beams with high aircraft density, while reducing or eliminating beams in low-density areas, thereby minimizing the number of processing modules and associated mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system optimizes beam parameters (number, shape, position) based on aircraft distribution to maximize reception capability with minimal processing modules. By changing these parameters dynamically, the satellite achieves high productivity without proportionally increasing mass, as fewer processing modules are required compared to static uniform beam coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If the satellite uses uniform beam coverage across the service area, then the coverage uniformity is improved, but the number of processing modules increases due to high aircraft density areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage uniformityVSAvoidnumber of processing modules
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different beam characteristics to different regions based on local aircraft density. In high-density areas, beams are narrower and more concentrated; in low-density areas, beams are wider and fewer. This local adaptation maintains effective coverage uniformity in terms of message detection capability while significantly reducing the total number of processing modules required compared to uniform beam coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The beam configuration is dynamically adjusted based on real-time aircraft density measurements. This allows the system to maintain uniform coverage quality across the service area by adapting beam parameters locally, rather than using a fixed uniform beam pattern that would require excessive processing modules in high-density regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces the number of processing modules needed by optimizing beam formation based on aircraft density, minimizing satellite size, mass, and power consumption while maintaining effective ADS-B message collection.

Implementation Method 1

a beamforming module (42) adapted to form beams (B) within a field of vision of the array of sources (41), a footprint of a beam defining a spot within the service area, the beamforming module being configured to form each beam by combining signals supplied by the array of sources by applying combination coefficients

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBeamforming:

Data Source

PatentEP4101086B1Device and system for the reception of ads-b messages by an orbiting satellite
Publication Date: 2025.09.03 AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE SAS
  • EP4101086B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4101086B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4101086B1 patent drawingFigure 5a~5c

AI summary

The present invention relates to a device (40) for the reception of ADS-B messages for a satellite (11), said reception device comprising an array (41) of sources and a beamforming module (42), a footprint of a field of view defining an area of service, different areas of service being associated with different positions of the satellite, a footprint of a beam defining a spot in the area of service, said beamforming module being configured so as to form each beam by applying combination coefficients, said reception device comprising a processing circuit (43) configured so as to obtain information representative of a position of the satellite and to modify a set of combination coefficients so as to adapt the surface area and/or the shape of the spots that are formed to a geographical distribution of the aircraft within the area of service associated with the position of the satellite.