Multi-Beam Satellite Beam Formation Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multi-beam satellite telecommunications systems face limitations in calculating phase and amplitude weighting coefficients due to processor constraints on board, leading to inefficient beam formation and increased bandwidth requirements, especially when dynamic and complex beams are needed to manage interferences.

Innovation Solution

A system that divides beam formation between on-board and ground-based processing, using a module on the satellite to form static or semi-static beams and a ground station to form dynamic beams, with a management center coordinating the coexistence of both, allowing for advanced signal processing and reduced bandwidth demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If ground-based beam forming is used to form dynamic and complex beams, then beam formation flexibility and signal processing capability are improved, but the required bandwidth for the connection link increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam formation flexibilityVSAvoidbandwidth requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beam formation process into two parts: on-board beam forming for static/semi-static beams and ground-based processing for dynamic beams. This segmentation allows the system to maintain flexibility through ground-based processing while limiting bandwidth requirements by handling only dynamic portions ground-based, rather than transmitting all beam formation data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the division of beam formation tasks between on-board and ground-based processing. The management center determines which beams are formed on-board and which are ground-formed based on real-time requirements, allowing the system to adapt to changing conditions while optimizing bandwidth usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If on-board processors calculate weighting coefficients, then beam formation can be performed autonomously on the satellite, but the calculation capability is limited by mass, power consumption and thermal dissipation constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveon-board beam forming capabilityVSAvoidprocessor power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the computational workload for beam forming into on-board and ground-based segments. On-board processors handle only the essential static/semi-static beam formation, while ground-based processors handle the more computationally intensive dynamic beam formation. This segmentation reduces the power consumption and computational burden on on-board processors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a management center as an intermediary that coordinates between on-board and ground-based processing. The management center receives information from the satellite, determines the optimal division of beam formation tasks, and sends control signals back to the satellite, enabling efficient distribution of computational load without requiring full on-board processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If all beams are formed ground-based, then advanced signal processing algorithms can be implemented, but the bandwidth requirement for the connection link becomes much higher

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal processing precisionVSAvoidconnection link bandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the signal processing tasks by beam type: static and semi-static beams are formed on-board with simpler processing, while only dynamic beams require ground-based advanced signal processing. This segmentation maintains signal processing precision where needed while significantly reducing the bandwidth requirement compared to processing all beams ground-based.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying advanced ground-based signal processing to all beams (excessive action), the patent applies it only to the necessary dynamic beams (partial action). This partial application of advanced processing maintains the required signal quality for complex scenarios while avoiding the excessive bandwidth consumption that would result from processing all beams ground-based.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9160443B2Multi-beam satellite telecommunications system and method for forming beams
Publication Date: 2015.10.13 AIRBUS DEFENCE & SPACE SAS
  • US9160443B2 patent drawing
  • US9160443B2 patent drawing
  • US9160443B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multi-beam telecommunications satellite, intended to be placed in orbit around the earth, and adapted to relay data between terrestrial terminals and at least one ground station and to form beams on a user link between the satellite and terrestrial terminals, includes a module for forming beams on board in the satellite, a module for processing beams in the ground station, and a module for routing signals received from the ground station and/or from terrestrial terminals, signals of beams formed on board being routed towards the on-board beam forming module, and signals of ground-formed beams being routed towards the ground-formed beam processing module. A telecommunications system including the multi-beam satellite, a ground station and a beam management center adapted to divide the beams into one group of ground-formed beams and one group of beams formed on board, as well as a method for forming beams are disclosed.