Satellite Downlink Beam Power Allocation for Variable User Load

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing 5G wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing dynamic power allocation for non-terrestrial radio networks to meet varying quality-of-service requirements of different classes, such as URLLC, eMBB, and mMTC, particularly in managing load variations and ensuring reliable, low-latency communications for mobile devices.

Innovation Solution

A method for determining and adjusting transmission power of non-terrestrial beams based on beam power allocation criteria, including power increase or decrease criteria, to optimize power distribution among served user equipment, and allocating remaining power to other beams uniformly or differently based on total transmission capability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic power allocation is implemented based on served user equipment numbers, then power management efficiency and QoS meeting capability are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveQoS requirement meeting capabilityVSAvoidpower allocation management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting transmission power levels based on the number of served user equipment and predefined thresholds. The system changes power allocation parameters (power increase/c decrease steps) according to real-time network conditions, transforming static power management into a dynamic parameter-adjustment mechanism that adapts to varying QoS requirements without requiring complex reconfiguration of the entire system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The non-terrestrial radio network node autonomously performs power allocation decisions by self-evaluating the number of served user equipment against predefined thresholds. The system serves itself by automatically determining when to increase or decrease power based on internal measurements, eliminating the need for external manual control or complex centralized management, thus reducing operational complexity while maintaining adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Quantity of substance

If transmission power is increased to serve more user equipment, then coverage and connectivity are improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of served user equipmentVSAvoidtransmission power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making transmission power adjustable rather than fixed. The system dynamically increases power when the number of served user equipment exceeds thresholds and decreases power when thresholds are not met, creating a flexible power management mechanism that matches energy consumption to actual network load requirements, thereby reducing wasted energy while maintaining connectivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the transmission power parameter based on real-time conditions. By establishing power increase steps and power decrease steps as adjustable parameters, the system optimizes energy consumption by only increasing power when necessary to serve additional user equipment, and by reducing power when the number of active users decreases, thus achieving efficient energy utilization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If uniform power allocation is used for all beams, then system simplicity is maintained, but power allocation efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower allocation simplicityVSAvoidpower allocation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different beams differently based on their specific conditions. Instead of uniform power allocation, the system determines individual power levels for each beam based on the number of user equipment served by that specific beam, creating localized power optimization that improves overall efficiency while maintaining manageable system complexity through standardized evaluation criteria

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260025171A1Dynamic power allocation of satellite downlink beams
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 DELL PROD LP
  • US20260025171A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025171A1 patent drawing
  • US20260025171A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-terrestrial radio network node may determine a count, or a number, of user equipment being served by, or that are connected to, the node via at least one non-terrestrial beam. The node may analyze the count, or number, with respect to at least one power increase criterion or at least one power decrease criterion. With respect to a baseline/default power allocation, the node may increase or decrease transmission power allocated to a particular non-terrestrial beam if the beam is determined to serve a number of user equipment that exceeds a configured power increase criterion or that is less than a configured power decrease criterion, respectively. The node may increase or decrease transmission power allocated to a non-terrestrial beam according to a configured power change step value. Based on counts of user equipment served by different beams, the node may determine to allocate different transmission power amounts to different beams.