Two-Stage Satellite Beamforming for Bandwidth Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern satellite communication systems face challenges in optimizing beamforming weights for dynamic users, leading to high computational burdens onboard satellites and significant bandwidth requirements in ground-based systems, necessitating a compromise between link quality and bandwidth usage.

Innovation Solution

A two-stage beamforming process is implemented, where fixed onboard beamforming weights are applied to reduce the number of downlink signals, and position-dependent ground-based beamforming weights are used to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio, optimizing the tradeoff between link quality and bandwidth usage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If ground-based beamforming combines signals from all antenna elements, then link quality is maximized, but bandwidth requirements become substantial

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink qualityVSAvoidbandwidth
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beamforming process into two stages: onboard beamforming that forms intermediate beams from antenna elements, and ground-based beamforming that combines these intermediate beams. This segmentation reduces the bandwidth requirement by transmitting processed intermediate signals rather than raw signals from all elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary beamforming processing onboard the satellite before transmission to the ground. By pre-combining signals from multiple antenna elements into fewer intermediate beams, the system reduces the amount of data that needs to be transmitted, thereby reducing bandwidth requirements while maintaining link quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If onboard beamforming uses dynamic weights for multiple users, then link quality improves, but computational burden becomes serious

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelink qualityVSAvoidcomputational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the computationally intensive beamforming task between the satellite and ground station. The satellite performs simplified onboard beamforming with fixed or semi-fixed weights, while the ground station performs the more complex adaptive beamforming computations, leveraging ground-based computational resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-computes beamforming weights onboard for a limited set of directions or users, reducing the real-time computational burden during operation. This allows the satellite to maintain acceptable link quality without requiring full dynamic reconfiguration for each user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8130140B2Optimized beamforming for satellite communication
Publication Date: 2012.03.06 HARRIS CORP
  • US8130140B2 patent drawing
  • US8130140B2 patent drawing
  • US8130140B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining beamforming weights used onboard a satellite and ground-based beamforming weights used in a ground-based station as part of a satellite communication system. This beamforming method is a two-stage beamforming process that requires a reduced downlink bandwidth between the satellite and the ground-based station yet achieves optimal signal-to-noise ratio for bandwidth allocated for the downlink. values for the fixed onboard beamforming weights are computed to yield a maximum,maxA⁢(minU⁢SN⁢❘W=W⋓),where the maximum is computed over all possible fixed weights A represented by an L×M matrix, the minimum is computed over all possible positions of remote communication devices U, and the signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) is computed for the optimal set of ground-based beamforming weights W={hacek over (W)}.