Satellite Debris Search Window Control for Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The proliferation of low earth satellites and orbital debris poses a significant collision risk, exacerbated by limited tracking capabilities and high positional uncertainties, leading to the potential for catastrophic collisions and the Kessler syndrome, necessitating efficient debris avoidance systems.

Innovation Solution

A satellite system equipped with debris sensor circuitry and controller circuitry to detect and avoid collisions by scanning a defined search window based on collision prediction data, using ground-based and onboard systems to determine debris position and velocity uncertainties, and generate avoidance maneuvers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If spacecraft-based sensors continuously scan the forward velocity quadrants to detect orbital debris, then collision detection capability is improved, but mechanical complexity and reliability challenges increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection capabilityVSAvoidmechanical and reliability challenges
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Ground-based systems perform preliminary tracking and prediction of debris trajectories, calculating uncertainty zones in advance. This pre-processing reduces the burden on onboard sensors, which only need to scan predefined search windows within these uncertainty zones rather than continuously scanning entire forward quadrants, thereby reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring task is divided into two segments: ground-based systems handle broad-area tracking and uncertainty zone calculation, while onboard sensors focus on scanning smaller, predefined search windows within those zones. This segmentation allows each system to operate at optimized complexity levels, with ground systems providing predictive guidance to reduce onboard scanning requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If ground-based radars improve tracking capability to reduce position uncertainty, then debris location precision is improved, but the complexity of track file correlation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition uncertaintyVSAvoidtrack file correlation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A satellite controller acts as an intermediary that receives tracking data from ground-based radars, performs track file correlation, and processes uncertainty calculations. This centralizes the complex correlation task at the satellite level, allowing ground systems to focus on high-precision tracking while the controller manages the computational complexity of matching multiple track files

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If satellite launches increase to support global internet communications, then service capability is improved, but the number of orbital objects and collision risk increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice capabilityVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback through ground-based tracking and onboard sensing that monitors debris positions and predicts potential collisions. When threats are detected, the system provides feedback to satellite controllers to execute avoidance maneuvers, creating a closed-loop system that actively manages collision risk as satellite constellations grow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification of debris and prediction of potential collision courses before actual threats materialize. By calculating uncertainty zones and predefined search windows in advance, the system prepares avoidance strategies proactively, enabling satellites to take preventive action rather than reacting to imminent threats, thus mitigating collision risk before it escalates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS12473102B2Satellite system with orbital debris avoidance
Publication Date: 2025.11.18 THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS ON BEHALF OF THE UNIV OF ARIZONA
  • US12473102B2 patent drawing
  • US12473102B2 patent drawing
  • US12473102B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a satellite system with orbital debris avoidance. In one embodiment, the satellite system includes debris sensor circuitry to scan orbital debris items in an orbital debris field; and sensor controller circuitry to determine a search window within the orbital debris field based on, at least, uncertainties associated with a velocity of the satellite (Vsatellite) and uncertainties associated with a velocity of at least one debris item (Vdebris), the sensor controller circuitry also to control the debris sensor circuitry to detect the at least one debris item within the search window.