Satellite Downlink Modulation Adjustment by Slant Range

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Satellite downlink transmissions are often bandwidth limited, particularly in low earth orbit (LEO) satellite communications, which restricts the amount of data that can be transmitted to ground terminals, necessitating improved bandwidth efficiency methods.

Innovation Solution

Adjusting the modulation and coding format based on the slant range distance from the satellite to the ground terminal, with different formats associated with specific distance ranges, and dynamically changing these settings based on signal quality metrics to optimize data transmission.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If higher order modulation and coding formats are used to increase data transmission capacity, then bandwidth efficiency is improved, but transmission reliability deteriorates due to increased susceptibility to signal degradation over distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission capacityVSAvoidtransmission reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the modulation and coding format based on real-time slant range distance measurements. As the satellite moves closer to the ground terminal, higher order modulation formats (e.g., 8PSK, 16APSK) are selected to maximize data capacity. As distance increases, the system transitions to more robust lower order formats (e.g., QPSK) to maintain transmission reliability. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by allowing both high productivity when conditions permit and high reliability when distance degrades the signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the modulation order and coding rate parameters based on the slant range distance. By monitoring the distance between satellite and ground terminal, the system adjusts key transmission parameters including modulation scheme (QPSK, 8PSK, 16APSK, 32APSK), coding rate (1/4, 1/3, 2/5, 1/2, 3/5, 2/3, 3/4, 4/5, 5/6, 8/9, 9/10), and guard interval length. This parameter adaptation enables the system to optimize both data capacity and transmission reliability according to actual propagation conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a fixed modulation and coding format is used to simplify system operation, then device complexity is reduced, but bandwidth efficiency deteriorates due to inability to adapt to varying distance conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem operation simplicityVSAvoidbandwidth efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The ground terminal autonomously measures the slant range distance to the satellite and independently determines the optimal modulation and coding format based on predefined distance thresholds. The ground terminal then communicates this selection to the satellite, which automatically configures its transmitter accordingly. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex centralized control systems while achieving high bandwidth efficiency through adaptive format selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the ground terminal continuously monitors the slant range distance and provides feedback to the satellite about the optimal modulation and coding format to use. This feedback loop enables the satellite to adjust its transmission parameters in real-time based on actual distance conditions, maximizing bandwidth efficiency without requiring complex manual configuration or centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If signal quality monitoring and dynamic format adjustment are implemented to optimize transmission, then bandwidth efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional measurement and control functions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality assessment by having the ground terminal independently measure the slant range distance and determine the optimal modulation and coding format for its specific location and conditions. Each ground terminal operates autonomously based on its local measurements rather than requiring centralized control or complex system-wide coordination. This local decision-making approach achieves high bandwidth efficiency while minimizing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2103004B1Modulation and coding adjustment of a satellite downlink based on the slant distance
Publication Date: 2010.05.26 VIASAT INC
  • EP2103004B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2103004B1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP2103004B1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

A satellite communications system adjusts a modulation and coding format for a downlink based on the slant range distance from the satellite to the receiving ground terminal. Modulation and coding formats are each associated with different sets of slant range distances. An estimated slant range from a satellite to a receiving ground terminal for a time period is determined, and the modulation and coding format associated with that slant range distance is identified. Data may then be transmitted by the satellite to the receiving ground terminal using the identified modulation and coding format for the time period. Additional factors may be considered in identifying the applicable modulation and coding format to be used.