Satellite Navigation Integrity Risk Assessment
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing satellite navigation systems face reduced availability of position solutions due to high integrity risk at an alarm barrier, particularly in safety-critical applications, as the current methods for calculating integrity risk can lead to increased errors and reduced accuracy.
Innovation Solution
A method and device that calculate the integrity risk at an alarm barrier by assuming a satellite is faulty under two different scenarios, determining a first integrity risk with all satellites and a second integrity risk with one satellite removed, and using the minimum of these two risks to determine the overall integrity risk, thereby enhancing the availability of position solutions.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If the current method of calculating integrity risk is used, then the integrity risk assessment is simplified, but the availability of position solutions is reduced
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the integrity risk calculation into multiple independent scenarios: one where all satellites are assumed error-free and another where each satellite is individually assumed to be faulty. This segmentation allows the system to evaluate different failure modes separately and combine results, improving both the accuracy of integrity assessment and the availability of position solutions by identifying which scenarios actually pose risks.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent applies partial action by calculating integrity risk only for relevant scenarios rather than exhaustively analyzing all possible satellite failure combinations. By focusing on the most critical cases (all satellites error-free vs. one satellite faulty) and using selective evaluation, the system achieves sufficient integrity assessment without the computational burden of complete analysis, thereby maintaining high availability.
2Reliability
If the integrity alarm limit is set strictly, then the safety of navigation is improved, but the number of false alarms increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring satellite signal quality and using this information to dynamically adjust integrity risk assessments. The system compares actual signal characteristics against expected values and uses this feedback to determine whether integrity alarms should be triggered, reducing false alarms while maintaining safety through adaptive threshold adjustment based on real-time conditions.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the parameter of alarm threshold from a fixed value to a dynamically adjusted value based on calculated integrity risk. By modifying the alarm threshold parameter according to the assessed integrity risk level and scenario-specific conditions, the system optimizes the balance between safety and false alarm reduction, allowing stricter thresholds when risks are high and more lenient thresholds when risks are low.
3Measurement precision
If statistical descriptions of signal errors are transmitted, then usage systems can calculate individual integrity risk, but the data transmission requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent extracts only the essential statistical parameters needed for integrity risk calculation (such as mean error and standard deviation of signal errors) and transmits only these extracted parameters rather than complete raw measurement data. This extraction approach provides sufficient information for usage systems to calculate individual integrity risk while minimizing data transmission volume and associated bandwidth requirements.
Data Source
AI summary
The method involves calculating (S10,S12) specific integrity risk at an alarm sensor by assuming that specific satellite is faulty. Specific position solution of signals received from satellites is determined (S14). Other position solution of received signals except from specific satellite is determined (S16). A reduced alarm sensor is formed (S20) by subtracting difference between position solutions from alarm sensor. Other integrity risk at reduced alarm sensor is calculated. The integrity risk at alarm sensor is determined (S24,S26,S28) by using minimum integrity risk. Independent claims are included for the following: (1) an alarm sensor integrity risk determining program stored in a computer readable medium; (2) a device for determining integrity risk of alarm sensor; and (3) a device for determining position based on signals from the satellite navigation system.


