Satellite Orbit Prediction Using Type-Specific Celestial Mechanics Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing satellite positioning systems, such as GPS, face errors in predicting satellite orbits due to the use of celestial mechanics models that do not account for the specific shape, size, and mass of different satellite types, leading to inaccuracies in position calculations.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to associate different celestial mechanics force models with specific satellite types, store ephemerides data for distinct time intervals, calculate reference positions using these models, determine errors, and detect the satellite type based on error analysis to select the appropriate model for orbit prediction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single celestial mechanics model is used for all satellites, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision of satellite position deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidsatellite position precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the satellite population into different types (e.g., GPS Block II-A, Block II-R, Block II-F) and assigns a specific celestial mechanics model to each type. This segmentation allows the system to account for the different shape, size, and mass characteristics of various satellite types, thereby improving position prediction accuracy without requiring a single overly complex universal model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the principle of local quality by tailoring the celestial mechanics model to each satellite type's specific characteristics. Each satellite type receives a locally optimized model that considers its unique shape, size, and mass properties, particularly regarding solar radiation pressure effects. This local customization improves measurement precision while keeping individual models manageable in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If multiple celestial mechanics models are used for different satellite types, then the measurement precision of satellite position is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesatellite position precisionVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic model selection mechanism where the receiver automatically identifies the satellite type and selects the appropriate celestial mechanics model in real-time. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to use multiple specialized models when needed, improving position precision, while maintaining operational simplicity through automated model selection based on satellite identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter set of the celestial mechanics model according to the satellite type. Different satellite types have different parameters (shape, size, mass) that affect solar radiation pressure. By adjusting these parameters based on satellite type identification, the system achieves high precision without requiring a completely separate complex system for each satellite type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the satellite type is not detected, then the ease of operation is maintained, but the reliability of position calculation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation simplicityVSAvoidposition calculation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the GPS receiver automatically detects the satellite type and selects the appropriate celestial mechanics model without requiring user intervention. The system autonomously identifies the satellite type from the received signal characteristics and configures the correct model, thereby maintaining ease of operation while significantly improving position calculation reliability through accurate modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs feedback mechanisms where the receiver continuously monitors satellite signal characteristics, identifies the satellite type, and adjusts the celestial mechanics model accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that the most appropriate model is always used for each satellite, improving reliability while keeping the operation transparent and simple for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves the accuracy of satellite orbit prediction by using the correct solar radiation pressure model for each satellite type, reducing errors and enhancing navigation system performance.

Implementation Method 1

Among the non-gravitational forces acting on a satellite there is the solar radiation pressure due to the solar wind action on a space vehicle as a satellite.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolar radiation pressure: Radiation Pressure

Data Source

PatentUS9798015B2Method and apparatus for predicting the orbit and detecting the type of a satellite
Publication Date: 2017.10.24 STMICROELECTRONICS INT NV
  • US9798015B2 patent drawing
  • US9798015B2 patent drawing
  • US9798015B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of predicting the orbit of a satellite of a satellite positioning system, including: associating first and second types of satellites with first and second models of celestial mechanics forces, respectively; storing first ephemerides data of a satellite, associated to first time intervals and second ephemerides data associated to second time intervals. Further, the method comprises: calculating reference satellite positions based on the first ephemerides data; estimating first and second satellite positions in the first time intervals by using the second ephemerides data and the first and second forces models, respectively; determining first and second estimate errors by comparing the reference positions with the first and second positions, respectively; and detecting the type of satellite between the first and second types by an analysis of the first and second errors.