Sausage Casing Robotic Transfer for Continuous Clipping Production

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing sausage production systems require manual or gravity-based refilling of tubular packaging casings, leading to downtime, potential damage, and complex alignment requirements, which increase operational complexity and production losses.

Innovation Solution

A system incorporating a robotic device to transfer tubular packaging casings to a clipping machine, featuring a filling tube assembly with a revolver plate and casing brake assemblies, and a control unit to optimize the refilling process, allowing for automated and efficient transfer without manual intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual or gravity-based refilling of tubular packaging casings is used, then the system structure is simpler, but production downtime increases and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction continuityVSAvoidrefilling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The refilling system is designed to be self-sufficient with automated robotic transfer and alignment mechanisms. The system automatically detects when casings need refilling, positions them precisely, and transfers them without manual intervention, making the system serve itself and eliminating production downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical refilling operations with an automated robotic system that uses controlled mechanical movement, positioning, and transfer mechanisms. This substitution of manual labor with automated mechanical systems ensures continuous production while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If gravity-based transfer of packaging casings is used, then the transfer mechanism is simpler, but damage to casings may occur and alignment precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecasing alignment precisionVSAvoidtransfer mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces gravity-based transfer with a controlled robotic mechanical transfer system. The robotic device uses precise mechanical positioning and controlled movement to transfer casings, ensuring accurate alignment while preventing damage through gentle, controlled handling rather than uncontrolled gravitational force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic device acts as an intermediary between the casing storage and the filling machine. It carefully handles and positions casings, using controlled mechanical interfaces to transfer them precisely without direct contact between storage and filling mechanisms, thereby preventing damage and ensuring alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated robotic transfer is implemented, then productivity increases and downtime is eliminated, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction speedVSAvoidautomated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic transfer system enables continuous operation by eliminating idle time between casing refills. The system is designed to transfer casings continuously without interruption to the filling process, maintaining uninterrupted production flow and maximizing productivity through continuous useful action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-positioning and pre-aligning casings before they are needed for filling. The robotic device prepares casings in advance, ensuring they are ready for immediate transfer, which eliminates waiting time and maintains continuous production speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of time

If manual refilling operations are used, then operational complexity is lower, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverefilling downtimeVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs its own refilling operations automatically without requiring manual intervention. The robotic device independently detects, retrieves, positions, and transfers casings, making the system self-sufficient and eliminating time loss associated with manual refilling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated refilling system ensures continuous production by eliminating idle time. The robotic transfer operates continuously without interruption, maintaining the filling process without the time losses that would occur with manual refilling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP4272567B1System for producing sausage-shaped products
Publication Date: 2025.07.02 POLY CLIP SYST
  • EP4272567B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4272567B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4272567B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention relates to system (1000) for producing sausage-shaped products (S), like sausages, by filling a filling material into a tubular packaging casing (M). The system (1000) includes a clipping machine (CM) for producing sausage-shaped products(S), a robotic device (300) for transferring a tubular packaging casing supply (M) to the clipping machine (CM), and a storage device (200) for storing a tubular packaging casing supply (M). The present invention further relates to a method for producing sausage-shaped products (S) in the system (1000).