Automated Savings Program Module for Transaction Rounding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective methods to facilitate and encourage savings, particularly for individuals with limited financial means or those aiming to save for specific goals, as they do not seamlessly integrate with existing transactional systems to automate savings processes in a user-friendly manner.

Innovation Solution

A networked system that includes a centrally accessible server with an automatic savings program module, enabling seamless connectivity with existing transactional systems to automatically generate savings amounts from financial transactions, provide notifications, and offer rewards, thereby encouraging savings through various techniques such as rounding up transactions or offering discounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If manual savings methods are used (deposits, transfers), then users can save money in bank accounts, but the process is difficult and requires active user participation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of savings processVSAvoiddifficulty of saving money
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs savings transactions without requiring user intervention. The savings program module autonomously calculates savings amounts, executes transfers from checking to savings accounts, and manages multiple savings goals based on predefined rules and user preferences established during enrollment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Users enroll in the savings program and configure their preferences in advance. The system then automatically executes savings transactions based on these pre-established parameters, performing the savings action before the user would need to manually initiate it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If automated savings programs are implemented, then savings process is automated, but integration with existing transactional systems is complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of savings processVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The savings program module is designed to work with multiple types of financial transactions and account structures through a unified interface. It can process various transaction types (debits, credits, transfers) and integrate with different bank systems using standard communication protocols, reducing integration complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary communication layer that translates between different transactional system formats and the savings program's internal processing format. This mediator handles account verification, transaction routing, and data formatting, simplifying integration with existing financial infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If savings are automated without user interface, then process is efficient, but users cannot manage or monitor their savings goals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of savings processVSAvoiduser ability to manage savings
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous feedback to users through notifications about their savings progress, account balances, and goal achievement status. Users receive updates on automated transactions and can monitor their financial health in real-time through the user interface, maintaining awareness while preserving automation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The user interface dynamically adapts to user needs, allowing users to enroll in the program, modify savings parameters, set multiple goals, and withdraw funds as needed. The system balances automated operation with user control, enabling users to intervene when necessary while maintaining efficient automated processing during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS10817880B2In-it-together savings goal feature
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 BANK OF AMERICA CORP
  • US10817880B2 patent drawing
  • US10817880B2 patent drawing
  • US10817880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer implemented systems and methods are disclosed involving technological advancements in the processing of electronic transaction processing. A system may comprise a networked environment including heterogeneous or homogenous payment processing systems. A centrally accessible server machine storing an automatic savings program module and rules controls the generation and dissemination of new transactions derived from incoming transactions. Moreover, the networked system may be used to control authorization of electronic transactions in a near real-time manner. The networked system may be used to distribute a financial health of a user in a user-friendly, mobile form factor.