Reciprocating Saw Blade High-Low Tooth Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reciprocating saw blades with steep clearance angles are prone to premature fracture and wear during abusive cutting applications due to their weakness, despite attempts to improve performance through thicker blades and varying tooth sets, which have not satisfactorily addressed the issue of tooth breakage and wear.

Innovation Solution

A reciprocating saw blade design featuring a repeating pattern of teeth with high and low teeth, where high teeth have a primary clearance angle of 28° or less and secondary clearance angle of 38° to 45°, and low teeth have a primary clearance angle of 17° to 25° and secondary clearance angle of 40° to 50°, providing both strength and durability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the primary clearance angle is increased to cut faster, then the cutting speed is improved, but the tooth strength decreases and becomes prone to fracture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidtooth strength
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different clearance angles to different portions of the tooth structure. The primary clearance surface has a first angle while the secondary clearance surface has a second angle that is greater than the first angle. This local differentiation allows the tooth to have both strength (through the steeper secondary angle providing structural support) and cutting efficiency (through the shallower primary angle providing aggressive cutting geometry).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the tooth by establishing a specific relationship between the primary and secondary clearance angles. The secondary clearance angle is defined to be greater than the primary clearance angle, creating an optimized tooth profile that balances strength and cutting performance. This parameter optimization resolves the contradiction by finding the ideal angular configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Strength

If the blade thickness is increased to resist bending and twisting, then the blade strength is improved, but the blade complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblade strengthVSAvoidblade complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than uniformly increasing the entire blade thickness, the patent focuses the thickness increase locally at the tooth structure where it is most needed for strength. The tooth profile is optimized with specific clearance angles that provide structural integrity without requiring a uniformly thicker blade, thereby maintaining overall blade simplicity while achieving the desired strength improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP2589018B1Reciprocating saw blade
Publication Date: 2019.10.02 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • EP2589018B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2589018B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2589018B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A recip saw blade has a blade body and a cutting edge extending along the blade body and defined by a repeating pattern of two consecutive teeth suitable for abusive cutting applications. The blade defines a relatively coarse tooth pitch. The two consecutive teeth, which may be bi-metal, include a high tooth and a relatively low tooth in comparison to the high tooth. Each high tooth and low tooth include a primary clearance surface defining a relatively shallow primary clearance angle that is about 28° or less, and a secondary clearance surface defining a relatively steep secondary clearance angle in comparison to the primary clearance angle. The primary clearance angle of the high tooth is steeper than the primary clearance angle of the low tooth, such as between about 23° and 28°, and the secondary clearance angle of the high tooth is shallower than the secondary clearance angle of the low tooth.