LiTaO3 SAW Filter Cut Angle Tuning for Spurious Response Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surface acoustic wave filters using multilayer bodies experience Rayleigh wave spurious responses on the lower frequency side, leading to degraded attenuation characteristics, especially when used in multiplexers, due to the lack of a unique cut angle for the piezoelectric substrate that optimizes filter characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A surface acoustic wave filter with a LiTaO3 piezoelectric layer having a cut angle θ°, a high acoustic velocity support substrate, a low acoustic velocity film, and an IDT electrode, where the cut angle θ is optimized based on structural parameters such as the repetition period, film thickness, specific gravity, and electrode duty to minimize Rayleigh wave spurious responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If a multilayer body with high acoustic velocity support substrate, low acoustic velocity film, and piezoelectric layer is used to increase Q-value, then low loss properties are improved, but Rayleigh wave spurious response generates on the lower frequency side causing attenuation characteristics to degrade

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveloss propertiesVSAvoidspurious response
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by optimizing the cut angle of the piezoelectric substrate based on specific structural parameters (wavelength, electrode film thickness, specific gravity, electrode duty, piezoelectric layer thickness, low acoustic velocity film thickness). This mathematical relationship determines the optimal cut angle to minimize Rayleigh wave spurious response while maintaining low loss properties in the pass band.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If the cut angle of the piezoelectric substrate is fixed to suppress spurious response, then attenuation characteristics improve, but filter characteristics cannot be optimized for different structural parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespurious responseVSAvoidfilter characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamics by making the cut angle adjustable and adaptable rather than fixed. The cut angle is determined dynamically based on the specific structural parameters of each filter design, allowing the system to optimize both spurious response suppression and filter characteristics for different applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes by establishing a mathematical relationship between the cut angle and multiple structural parameters (wavelength, electrode film thickness, specific gravity, electrode duty, piezoelectric layer thickness, low acoustic velocity film thickness). This allows the cut angle to be customized for different filter designs while consistently minimizing spurious response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If structural parameters of IDT electrode and piezoelectric material are optimized for filter characteristics, then pass band performance improves, but Rayleigh wave spurious response increases on the lower frequency side

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilter characteristicsVSAvoidspurious response
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by introducing the cut angle as an additional optimization parameter. By determining the optimal cut angle based on the structural parameters already required for filter characteristics, the patent simultaneously optimizes both pass band performance and spurious response suppression without requiring separate optimizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The optimized cut angle θ reduces spurious responses in the attenuation band on the lower frequency side, ensuring low loss properties in the pass band and improved filter characteristics, enabling high attenuation and isolation in multiplexers.

Implementation Method 1

a LiTaO3 piezoelectric layer having a cut angle θ°

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

surface acoustic wave filter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface acoustic wave: Surface Acoustic Wave

Implementation Method 3

a high acoustic velocity support substrate in which a bulk wave propagates at a higher acoustic velocity than an acoustic wave propagating in the LiTaO3 piezoelectric layer, a low acoustic velocity film which is between the high acoustic velocity support substrate and the LiTaO3 piezoelectric layer, and in which a bulk wave propagates at a lower acoustic velocity than the acoustic wave propagating in the LiTaO3 piezoelectric film

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic impedance mismatch:

Data Source

PatentUS10778187B2Surface acoustic wave filter and multiplexer
Publication Date: 2020.09.15 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US10778187B2 patent drawing
  • US10778187B2 patent drawing
  • US10778187B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A filter includes a LiTaO3 piezoelectric layer having a cut angle, a high acoustic velocity support substrate, a low acoustic velocity film, and an IDT electrode. A cut angle θB of the piezoelectric layer at which a Rayleigh wave spurious response is locally reduced or minimized is determined from a wavelength of the IDT electrode, a film thickness of the IDT electrode, a specific gravity of the IDT electrode, an electrode duty, a thickness of the piezoelectric layer, and a film thickness of the low acoustic velocity film. The Cut angle of the piezoelectric layer satisfies a relationship of θB−4≤θ≤θB+4.