SBFD Random Access Occasion Selection for Collision-Aware Retransmission

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communications systems, subband full duplex (SBFD)-aware devices face challenges such as random access collisions, inefficient resource use, and increased latency due to uncoordinated UE selection of random access occasions (ROs), leading to degraded user experience and system performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing network-controlled RO selection techniques, including probability values and threshold configurations, to guide UEs in selecting between half-duplex and SBFD ROs, thereby optimizing resource use and reducing collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If UEs autonomously select random access occasions without network coordination, then device complexity and operation autonomy are improved, but random access collisions and resource efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveUE autonomy in RO selectionVSAvoidrandom access collision rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The network provides feedback to UEs about the selected RO through downlink control information (DCI), enabling coordinated random access. The network entity monitors UE selections and provides guidance signals that reduce collisions while maintaining UE autonomy in the final selection decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The network entity acts as an intermediary that coordinates between multiple UEs and the random access resources. By providing control signaling that indicates preferred ROs, the network mediates the selection process to reduce collisions without completely removing UE autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple ROs are provided for half-duplex and SBFD modes, then adaptability to different duplex modes is improved, but device complexity and configuration complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport for multiple duplex modesVSAvoidRO configuration management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The random access occasions are segmented into different sets corresponding to different duplex modes (half-duplex and SBFD). Each set is configured with specific parameters, allowing UEs to select the appropriate set based on their operational mode while simplifying the overall management through clear separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects between different RO sets based on the duplex mode. The network can indicate which RO set to use through control signaling, allowing flexible adaptation between half-duplex and SBFD operations without requiring UEs to manage all configurations simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If network-controlled RO selection is implemented, then resource efficiency and collision reduction are improved, but system latency and control signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol signaling latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The network pre-configures multiple RO sets for different duplex modes before random access occurs. This preliminary configuration reduces the need for real-time control signaling during the actual random access procedure, thereby reducing latency while maintaining resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters such as the RO set index based on duplex mode through control signaling. By optimizing which parameters are signaled and when, the system achieves good resource utilization while minimizing the timing impact of control overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260046938A1Random access occasion selection for subband full duplex-aware devices
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20260046938A1 patent drawing
  • US20260046938A1 patent drawing
  • US20260046938A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A network entity may indicate, to a user equipment (UE), a probability value indicating a likelihood that the UE will select a subband full duplex (SBFD) random access occasion (RO) (e.g., instead of a non-SBFD RO) for an initial random access transmission. In case of random access failure, the UE may select another RO and retransmit a random access preamble. In some examples, the network may also configure one or more additional probability values for subsequent retransmissions. In some examples, the network entity may also provide one or more threshold values providing constraints for switching between types of ROs. The UE may transmit capability information to the network entity indicating its capability to switch between ROs of different types, quantities of times the UE is capable of switching or quantities of transmissions the UE supports before switching.