3D Scaffold with Inner-Outer Wall Segmentation for Bone Regeneration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current tissue engineering scaffolds face challenges in balancing porosity for bone regeneration with mechanical stability, particularly for load-bearing tissues like bone and cartilage, and often lack reproducibility and biological cues for angiogenesis and osteogenesis.

Innovation Solution

A 3D scaffold design with separate inner and outer portions allows for independent optimization of shape, material, and porosity, using computer-controlled fabrication techniques to create a structure that mimics natural bone anatomy, ensuring mechanical stability while providing porosity for cell growth and nutrient exchange.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the porosity of the scaffold is increased to promote bone cell growth, then bone regeneration success is improved, but the mechanical stability of the scaffold deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone regeneration successVSAvoidmechanical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The scaffold is divided into multiple layers with different porosity levels. The lower layers have higher porosity to promote bone cell growth and infiltration, while the upper layers have lower porosity to provide mechanical support and stability. This segmentation allows each layer to optimize its function independently, resolving the contradiction between porosity and mechanical stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the scaffold are assigned different porosity characteristics tailored to their specific functional requirements. The base and lower portions have higher porosity for cell attachment and nutrient transport, while the upper load-bearing regions have optimized porosity to maintain structural integrity. This local differentiation enables simultaneous achievement of biological functionality and mechanical strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual intervention is used in scaffold fabrication techniques such as solvent-casting/particulate-leaching and electrospinning, then scaffold customization is possible, but reproducibility and manufacturing precision deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescaffold customizationVSAvoidscaffold reproducibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical fabrication processes with computer-controlled additive manufacturing (3D printing). This substitution eliminates human variability and manual intervention, enabling precise control over scaffold geometry, porosity, and structural parameters. The digital modeling and automated fabrication ensure high reproducibility while maintaining the ability to customize scaffold designs for different applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If ceramic materials are used to create biocompatible and biodegradable scaffolds, then bone regeneration support is improved, but mechanical brittleness and fracture susceptibility worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone regeneration supportVSAvoidmechanical brittleness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs composite material systems that combine ceramic particles or phases with polymer matrices. The ceramic components provide osteoconductivity and bone regeneration support, while the polymer matrix contributes flexibility, toughness, and fracture resistance. This composite approach allows the scaffold to simultaneously achieve the biological benefits of ceramic materials while overcoming their inherent brittleness through the ductile polymer phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentEP3592297B1Tissue engineering scaffolds
Publication Date: 2023.08.16 VESTLANDETS INNOVASJONSSELSKAP AS
  • EP3592297B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1c
  • EP3592297B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3592297B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A scaffold (12) for tissue engineering comprises an inner portion (14), an outer portion (16), and a base portion (22) connecting the inner portion and the outer portion. The inner portion (14) comprises a channel (18) surrounded by a first set of one or more walls. The outer portion (16) comprises a second set of one or more walls. The portions are arranged such that the second set of one or more walls substantially surrounds the first set of one or more walls with a spacing between the first and second sets of walls defining a cavity (20) between the inner portion (14) and the outer portion (16). The inner portion (14) and the outer portion (16) may have different shapes; and/or the scaffold (12) may further comprise a filler material in the cavity (20) defined between the inner and outer portions.