Scaffold Tray with Pole-Engaging Recesses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solutions for tool storage on scaffolding towers are either unsuitable or inadequate, as they lack secure engagement with the tower rails, are unstable in wind, or complicate tool retrieval, posing safety and accessibility issues for tradesmen.

Innovation Solution

A lipped tray with recessed regions on its sides that engage with scaffolding poles, using a push-fit mechanism and optional locking straps to secure the tray in place, allowing easy access and stability, and folding for carrying and storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the tray uses a deep receptacle design to engage with scaffolding poles, then stability is improved, but tool accessibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetray stabilityVSAvoidtool accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from deep vertical engagement (Nolan's design) to shallow engagement by utilizing the horizontal dimension between two poles. The tray engages with both poles simultaneously, creating stability through spatial distribution rather than deep vertical insertion, thereby allowing shallow depth and easy tool access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If the tray engages with only one rail, then device complexity is reduced, but stability deteriorates due to wind vulnerability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement mechanism complexityVSAvoidtray stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines engagement with two separate poles into a single unified tray structure. The tray simultaneously engages both poles, merging two engagement points into one device, which provides bidirectional stability against wind forces while maintaining simple overall design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the tray is designed to be securely locked in place, then reliability is improved, but ease of removal deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetray securityVSAvoidtray removal
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the permanent locking mechanism from the design, relying instead on friction-based engagement through recessed regions. The tray can be pushed onto the poles for secure engagement during use, but can also be easily removed by pulling it off, providing both security and ease of removal without complex locking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If the tray uses a shallow design for easy tool access, then tool accessibility is improved, but stability deteriorates due to wind susceptibility

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool accessibilityVSAvoidtray stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent compensates for shallow depth by utilizing the horizontal dimension between two poles. Instead of relying on vertical depth for stability, the tray distributes engagement forces across two separate pole contact points, achieving stability through spatial distribution in the horizontal plane while maintaining shallow vertical profile for easy tool access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP2507445B1Scaffold tray
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 MOORE PHILIP
  • EP2507445B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2507445B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4b

AI summary

The present invention discloses a lipped tray, intended for use on scaffold towers and adapted to hold builders' tools in use. The tray incorporates on each of its two opposite side edge regions a means which, when the tray is in use, locates the tray between horizontally successive rails of the tower in a manner which also causes the tray to engage with one at least of those rails and be supported, in use, by each of them.