Scalable DSP Architecture via Modular Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current on-board satellite digital signal processing systems face challenges in scalability, signal integrity, and efficient testing due to the limitations of traditional back-plane solutions, which are not fully scalable and require extensive re-design and re-qualification for different mission sizes, and often result in inefficient mass usage and delayed environmental qualification testing.

Innovation Solution

A scalable architecture comprising physically distinct processing modules connected by high-speed digital interconnections, allowing for flexible configuration and phased testing, where modules can be independently tested and swapped, enabling efficient signal processing and redundancy management.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a back-plane solution is used for digital signal processing, then mechanical structure and shielding are provided, but scalability is limited and re-design is required for different mission sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovescalabilityVSAvoidre-design requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into multiple independent processing modules that can be connected through standardized interfaces. Each module handles specific signal processing functions and can be independently configured, allowing the system to be scaled by adding or removing modules rather than redesigning the entire back-plane structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The processing modules are designed with universal interfaces and standardized connection protocols that allow them to function in various configurations. The same module type can serve different processing roles depending on how modules are interconnected, eliminating the need for mission-specific redesigns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If a back-plane solution is used for digital signal processing, then interconnection is provided, but mass consumption increases and testing is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidmass consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the system into separate processing modules, each module can be tested independently before integration. This phased testing approach allows environmental qualification testing to be performed on smaller units rather than the entire system, improving testing efficiency and reducing the mass that must be qualified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Processing modules can be pre-tested and environmentally qualified before final system integration. This preliminary action allows testing to be performed on smaller, lighter components rather than the complete system, reducing overall mass consumption while maintaining testing thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the number of inputs and outputs is increased, then processing capacity is improved, but cross-connection requirements increase substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidcross-connection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cross-connection complexity is segmented across multiple processing modules, each handling a subset of inputs and outputs. Rather than requiring a single complex back-plane to manage all cross-connections, the burden is distributed across multiple standardized module interfaces, making the system more manageable and scalable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Processing modules act as intermediary units between inputs and outputs. Each module provides standardized interfaces that simplify the connection process, acting as mediators that manage cross-connections locally rather than requiring global routing through a complex back-plane structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10187142B2Scalable architecture for digital signal processing
Publication Date: 2019.01.22 AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE LTD
  • US10187142B2 patent drawing
  • US10187142B2 patent drawing
  • US10187142B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Architecture is described for implementing digital signal processors, defined by a plurality of physically distinct processing modules connected by high speed digital interconnections in which a first plurality of first modules have a plurality of analog or digital signal inputs and arranged to perform a first set of digital processing functions and produce a first plurality of digital interconnection outputs, a second plurality of second modules are arranged to receive the first plurality of digital interconnection outputs and perform a second set of digital processing functions and produce a second plurality of digital interconnection outputs, and a third plurality of third modules are arranged to receive the second plurality of digital interconnection outputs and perform a third set of digital processing functions and produce a plurality of analog or digital signal outputs, wherein the architecture is scalable by selection of the number of first modules, the number of second modules and the number of third modules and the interconnections between them such that the signal processing required of a digital signal processor is achieved through the distribution of the processing over the combination of the selected numbers of first, second and third modules.