Scalable Production Service Testing via Real Request Replay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current testing methods for large-scale computing systems are not scalable and often miss issues that arise only at higher scales, leading to potential outages and degraded customer experience due to the inability to simulate real-world, high-load scenarios effectively.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for scalable testing of network-based production services that captures and replays real-world client request data to simulate loads, using an auto-scaler to adjust the number of workers and an auto-shutdown module to manage resources and prevent system overload, allowing for peak load simulations without impacting normal operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a scaled-down copy of the production system is used for testing, then testing resources and costs are reduced, but the testing scalability and ability to detect high-scale issues are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting system scaleVSAvoidtesting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the testing function into multiple independent worker nodes that can be dynamically scaled. Each worker processes test cases independently, allowing the testing system to scale horizontally by adding more workers rather than increasing the scale of a single monolithic test system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The testing system is designed to be universal by accepting test cases in standardized formats and supporting multiple types of tests (functional, performance, stress tests) through a common framework. This allows the same system to handle various testing scenarios without requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If component-level stress tests are performed individually, then testing focus and depth are improved, but system-wide interaction issues are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent test depthVSAvoidsystem integration reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges individual component tests into comprehensive system-wide tests by orchestrating multiple workers to execute tests across different components simultaneously while maintaining their interconnections. This allows both component-level depth and system-wide integration testing to occur together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of system architecture and test case dependencies to automatically generate integrated test scenarios that cover both individual components and their interactions. This preliminary planning ensures that component-level precision and system-wide reliability are both addressed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If real-world data is used for large-scale stress testing, then testing realism and accuracy are improved, but data storage, access, and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting realismVSAvoiddata infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates simplified copies of real-world data that preserve the essential characteristics and patterns needed for realistic testing while removing unnecessary complexity. These synthetic test data sets replicate production data distributions and relationships without requiring storage or processing of actual large-scale production data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms real-world data into test-ready formats by adjusting parameters such as data volume, timing patterns, and load characteristics. This allows the same underlying data to be used for both realistic representation and efficient processing by modifying its parameters rather than storing multiple versions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If the number of workers is increased to handle peak load simulations, then testing capacity and scalability are improved, but resource consumption and system overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting capacityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of active workers based on the current test phase, system capacity, and resource availability. During peak load simulations, workers are scaled up as needed, and during normal operations, fewer workers are active, optimizing resource usage while maintaining testing capacity when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms that monitor resource consumption and test progress in real-time, automatically adjusting worker allocation to maintain optimal performance. This feedback loop ensures that computational resources are efficiently utilized while still achieving the required testing capacity for peak load scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9329915B1System and method for testing in a production environment
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US9329915B1 patent drawing
  • US9329915B1 patent drawing
  • US9329915B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A network-based production service is configured to process client requests for the production service via a network, capture production request data defining the requests and store the production request data in a data store. A test system comprising one or more controllers creates test jobs according to a test plan for testing the production service. The test plan creates a test profile for using specified production request data to simulate a load on the production service. Each job created by the test plan specifies a portion of production request data. A job queue receives and queues test jobs from one or more controllers configured to add test jobs to the job queue according to the test plan. Workers access jobs from the job queue and the production request data from the data store as specified in each job and replay the production request data to the production service.