Scalable Video Bitstream Merging for Streaming Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video streaming services face inefficiencies in providing scalable video coding that maintains high image quality across various resolutions and frame rates, as existing algorithms either waste computational resources and storage or degrade image quality to achieve scalability.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the generation of multiple scalable bitstreams with different resolutions and frame rates, combined into a super bitstream, allowing for efficient truncation and transmission of requested video sequences while maintaining image quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate bitstreams are generated for different resolutions and frame rates, then video scalability is improved, but device complexity and storage requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo scalabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple separate bitstreams for different resolutions and frame rates into a single integrated bitstream structure. This merging approach maintains the scalability benefits of having multiple resolutions while reducing the complexity of managing separate encoding/decoding systems for each resolution level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal bitstream structure that can serve multiple resolution and frame rate requirements simultaneously. A single bitstream can be decoded at different quality levels, making the system multi-functional without requiring separate processing paths for each resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate bitstreams are generated for different resolutions and frame rates, then video scalability is improved, but storage capacity requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo scalabilityVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple bitstreams into a single integrated structure, eliminating redundant storage requirements. By combining the bitstreams, the system stores video data once while maintaining the ability to provide multiple resolution outputs, significantly reducing total storage capacity needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nested bitstream structure where lower resolution data is embedded within the higher resolution bitstream. This allows the same stored data to serve multiple resolution requirements, with each resolution level being a nested subset of the complete high-resolution data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Quantity of substance

If a single bitstream is used for all resolutions, then storage efficiency is improved, but image quality degrades at lower resolutions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage efficiencyVSAvoidimage quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality enhancement by providing different quality levels at different resolution layers within the single bitstream. Each resolution level maintains optimal image quality through dedicated encoding parameters, while the overall structure remains storage-efficient through unified bitstream management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the single bitstream into multiple quality layers, where each layer corresponds to a specific resolution and quality level. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high storage efficiency while ensuring that each resolution level delivers optimal image quality through specialized encoding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple encoders are used for different resolutions, then video quality at each resolution is improved, but computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevideo qualityVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a universal encoder that can produce multiple resolution outputs through a single encoding process. This multi-functional encoder maintains high video quality at all resolutions by using scalable encoding techniques, eliminating the need for multiple separate encoding operations and reducing computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8331434B2Method and apparatus for video coding, predecoding, and video decoding for video streaming service, and image filtering method
Publication Date: 2012.12.11 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US8331434B2 patent drawing
  • US8331434B2 patent drawing
  • US8331434B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and apparatus for video encoding, predecoding, and video decoding for video streaming services. The video encoding method includes encoding first and second video sequences into first and second bitstreams using scalable video coding, wherein at least one of resolution, frame rate, and image quality of the second video sequence is different from that of the first video sequence, and combining the first and second bitstreams into a super bitstream.