Scaling Decision Device for Soft-Decision Decoder Normalization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing normalization methods for soft-decision decoders in wireless communications struggle to effectively manage quantization errors in multichannel fading situations, leading to information loss and reception failures due to inadequate control over subcarriers with smaller amplitudes.

Innovation Solution

A scaling decision device that calculates a scaling value based on the K-th smallest signal intensity, using a first decision unit to determine the signal range and a second decision unit to prevent quantization errors, allowing for precise normalization and error correction in fading environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the bit width of soft-decision decoder is increased to improve reception performance, then reception performance is improved, but area, consumption power increase and maximum operation frequency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception performanceVSAvoiddecoder area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the scaling value based on signal conditions (using K-th smallest value of absolute values of received signals). This allows the decoder to maintain high reception performance with a fixed, smaller bit width by adapting the normalization parameter to fading conditions, thereby avoiding the need to increase decoder area while preserving reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the bit width of soft-decision decoder is increased to improve reception performance, then reception performance is improved, but consumption power increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception performanceVSAvoidconsumption power
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By dynamically changing the scaling parameter based on signal conditions rather than increasing bit width, the patent reduces power consumption while maintaining reception performance. The scaling decision device adjusts normalization parameters adaptively, allowing efficient operation with fixed-width registers and reducing the energy cost associated with wider data paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the bit width of soft-decision decoder is increased to improve reception performance, then reception performance is improved, but maximum operation frequency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception performanceVSAvoidmaximum operation frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent maintains high operation frequency by using parameter adaptation instead of increased bit width. The scaling decision device computes and applies normalization parameters dynamically, allowing the decoder to achieve high reception performance with fixed, smaller bit widths that can be processed at higher speeds without the computational overhead of wider data paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If conventional normalization methods are used in multichannel fading situations, then some reception performance is achieved, but information loss occurs due to inadequate control over subcarriers with smaller amplitudes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereception performanceVSAvoidinformation loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by treating different subcarriers differently based on their amplitude characteristics. The scaling decision device identifies the K-th smallest absolute value and uses it as the scaling basis, ensuring that even weak subcarriers are properly normalized. This localized adaptation to signal conditions prevents information loss in fading conditions while maintaining overall system performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Ease of operation

If simple scaling method with reference to power average of subcarriers is used, then some normalization is achieved, but it is difficult to perfectly apply in multichannel fading situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenormalization simplicityVSAvoidreception performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent improves upon simple power-average scaling by dynamically changing the normalization parameter based on actual signal conditions. Instead of using a fixed or simple average scaling factor, the system computes the K-th smallest absolute value and adapts the scaling parameter accordingly, maintaining simplicity of operation while significantly improving reliability in fading conditions through parameter adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8718200B2Scaling decision device and method for deciding scaling value used in normalization of signal
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 KK TOSHIBA
  • US8718200B2 patent drawing
  • US8718200B2 patent drawing
  • US8718200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a scaling decision device includes a first decision unit and a second decision unit. The first decision unit decides, based on a plurality of input signals, a K-th smallest signal of the plurality of input signals or a range to which the K-th smallest signal belongs of a plurality of ranges which classify the plurality of input signals by intensities. The second decision unit decides, based on a decision result of the first decision unit, a scaling value which prevents the K-th smallest signal from being submerged in quantization errors by normalization.