SCALLOPS SFQ Pulse Timing for Low-Leakage Qubit Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for controlling superconducting qubits in large-scale quantum computing systems face challenges with high-fidelity control and measurement due to crosstalk, hardware overhead, and latency issues, particularly in surface code architectures requiring millions of physical qubits.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of SCALable Leakage Optimized Pulse Sequences (SCALLOPS) using a single flux quantum (SFQ) driver to generate pulse sequences with symmetric pairs of voltage pulses timed relative to the qubit frequency, optimizing gate fidelity and minimizing leakage across a range of qubit frequencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate high-bandwidth control lines are used for each qubit channel, then high-fidelity control is achieved, but heat load on the milli-Kelvin stage becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol fidelityVSAvoidheat load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The control signal is segmented into discrete voltage levels (0, +Ve, -Ve) that can be transmitted through a single shared control line. The SFQ driver circuit segments the continuous control waveform into quantized flux packets, allowing multiple qubits to be addressed through time-multiplexed signaling on a single line, thereby reducing the number of physical control lines and associated heat loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The SFQ driver acts as an intermediary device that converts standard voltage control signals into single-flux-quantum pulses. This intermediary circuit translates conventional control waveforms into quantized flux packets that can be efficiently transmitted through superconducting lines with minimal heat load, bridging the gap between standard control electronics and superconducting qubit requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If control waveforms are recycled across a qubit array, then hardware resources are reduced, but control fidelity deteriorates due to transfer function variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehardware overheadVSAvoidcontrol fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the timing and amplitude parameters of the recycled control waveforms to compensate for variations in transfer functions across different qubit channels. By calibrating and adjusting these parameters for each qubit, the system maintains high control fidelity even when using shared control lines and recycled waveforms, effectively adapting the control signals to match the specific characteristics of each qubit channel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If qubits are biased at different operating frequencies to minimize crosstalk, then addressability is improved, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecrosstalkVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic SFQ clock cycles to systematically address qubits at different frequencies. By organizing control signals into regular periodic sequences with specific timing relationships to qubit frequencies, the system can efficiently address multiple qubits with different operating frequencies using a unified control architecture, reducing the overall control complexity despite the frequency diversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Reliability

If SFQ pulses are used for qubit control, then leakage is minimized and gate fidelity is improved, but the system requires precise timing synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegate fidelityVSAvoidtiming synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor the actual timing and delivery of SFQ pulses to qubits. By measuring the response of qubits to control pulses and adjusting the timing of subsequent pulses based on these measurements, the system maintains precise synchronization without requiring overly complex predetermined timing sequences. This feedback-driven approach adapts to variations in qubit frequencies and control line characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables high-fidelity control of multiple qubits with reduced hardware resources and latency, achieving gate fidelities greater than 99.99% across a range of frequencies, suitable for large-scale quantum computing.

Implementation Method 1

a single flux quantum ('SFQ') driver coupled to the superconducting qubit, wherein the SFQ driver is configured to provide a pulse sequence to control the superconducting qubit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

qubits based on Josephson tunnel junctions, which include two superconducting electrodes separated by a thin insulator, are advantageous due to their strongly nonlinear behavior

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJosephson effect: Josephson Effect

Implementation Method 3

superconducting materials have inherently low dissipation that, in principle, can produce coherence times necessary for performing useful calculations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuperconductivity: Superconductivity

Data Source

PatentUS20200250564A1System and method for controlling superconducting qubits using single flux quantum logic
Publication Date: 2020.08.06 WISCONSIN ALUMNI RES FOUND
  • US20200250564A1 patent drawing
  • US20200250564A1 patent drawing
  • US20200250564A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for controlling superconducting qubits is provided. In some aspects the method includes assembling, using a controller of a quantum computing system, a pulse subsequence that comprises pairs of voltage pulses timed symmetrically with respect to a period corresponding to a qubit frequency of a superconducting qubit in the quantum computing system. The method also includes generating, using the controller, a pulse sequence using a repetition of a pulse subsequence. The method further includes controlling the superconducting qubit by applying the pulse sequence to the superconducting qubit using a single flux quantum (“SFQ”) driver coupled thereto.