3D Scan Accuracy Loss Monitoring in Reverse Engineering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

During reverse engineering processes using 3D scan data, there is a significant challenge in tracking and managing accuracy loss due to smoothing operations and decimation, which leads to deviations between the original scan data and the reverse-engineered CAD model, making it difficult for users to maintain data integrity.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that measures and displays accuracy loss in real-time, allowing users to set error tolerance and visualize error distribution through color mapping or whisker mapping, providing feedback on undesirable editing or modeling parameters, and enabling adjustments to minimize accuracy loss.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If smoothing operations are performed on raw 3D scan data, then the data becomes easier to process and model, but accuracy loss occurs due to point displacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of processingVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors and displays accuracy loss in real-time during smoothing operations, providing feedback to the user about the deviation between original scan data and processed data. This allows users to adjust processing parameters to maintain acceptable accuracy levels while achieving the desired ease of processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies smoothing operations selectively and controls the degree of smoothing applied, rather than uniformly processing all data. This allows partial smoothing in regions where it benefits processing ease while preserving accuracy in critical regions, or applying excessive smoothing only where acceptable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If decimation is performed to reduce mesh facets, then processing efficiency improves, but accuracy loss occurs due to coordinate modification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback on accuracy loss during decimation operations, displaying the deviation between original and decimated mesh data. This enables users to monitor processing efficiency gains against accuracy loss and adjust decimation parameters accordingly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies decimation selectively to different regions of the mesh, using aggressive decimation in non-critical areas to improve processing efficiency while applying minimal or no decimation in critical areas where accuracy must be preserved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of manufacture

If CAD modeling is performed to replicate 3D scan data, then a usable CAD model is produced, but accuracy loss occurs due to disparity between scan points and parametric surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCAD model usabilityVSAvoidaccuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously displays accuracy loss during CAD modeling operations, showing the deviation between the parametric CAD surfaces and the original scan data. This feedback enables users to adjust modeling parameters and techniques to minimize accuracy loss while producing usable CAD models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows different levels of accuracy in different regions of the CAD model, applying tighter tolerances in critical areas and looser tolerances in non-critical areas, enabling the production of usable CAD models that replicate scan data with appropriate accuracy for each region's function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Reliability

If continuous accuracy monitoring is implemented throughout the reverse engineering process, then data integrity is maintained, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs accuracy calculations and displays results without requiring manual intervention. The accuracy monitoring is integrated into the existing reverse engineering workflow, allowing the system to self-monitor and report accuracy loss while users continue their normal processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The accuracy monitoring functionality is merged with the existing reverse engineering software platform, combining accuracy analysis with scan processing, mesh editing, and CAD modeling operations in a single integrated system rather than requiring separate monitoring tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUSRE48498E1System and method for analyzing modeling accuracy while performing reverse engineering with 3D scan data
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 HEXAGON METROLOGY KOREA LLC
  • USRE48498E1 patent drawing
  • USRE48498E1 patent drawing
  • USRE48498E1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated mechanism for measuring the amount of accuracy loss attributable to reverse engineering processes that use 3D scan data is discussed. The embodiments provide a mechanism that displays to a user the effect scan data editing and CAD remodeling operations have on scan data accuracy. Additionally, the user can choose the way the graphical display illustrates the error distribution on the model such as by color mapping and whisker mapping. The accuracy loss may be displayed to the user after finishing an editing/modeling command or during the previewing of the command thereby allowing a user to take appropriate action. Parameters may also be adjusted programmatically based on the amount of accuracy loss determined to be attributable to scan data editing or CAD remodeling operations.