Scan Avoidance Detection System for Retail Fraud Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional point of sale systems are vulnerable to theft and fraud due to 'pass-through' and 'sweethearting' methods, where items are not scanned, leading to significant financial losses for retailers, and existing detection methods like scan-gap analysis are impractical and prone to false positives.

Innovation Solution

A scan avoidance detection system utilizing a surveillance system with digital video analyzers, combining video feeds from cameras with data from weight sensors, RFID readers, and other sensors to accurately track items in shopping carts and detect changes, correlating this data with transaction logs to identify unscanned items.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional point of sale scanning systems are used, then item identification and transaction processing are enabled, but the system becomes vulnerable to theft and fraud through pass-through and sweethearting methods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction accuracyVSAvoidtheft and fraud vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary detection system comprising cameras, weight sensors, and RFID readers that monitor the transaction process independently from the scanning system. This intermediary system detects items on conveyors and compares them against scanned items, providing an additional layer of verification that prevents pass-through and sweethearting fraud without interfering with normal scanning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by constantly monitoring the conveyor belt with multiple sensors, comparing detected items against the transaction log in real-time, and generating alerts when discrepancies are found. This feedback loop ensures that any unscanned items are immediately detected and reported, maintaining transaction integrity throughout the checkout process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If scan-gap analysis is used to detect unscanned items, then potential fraud detection is enabled, but the method produces false positives and is impractical for reliable detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunscanned item detectionVSAvoiddetection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/manual scan-gap analysis method with an automated sensor-based detection system. Instead of relying on timing intervals and manual review, the system uses cameras, weight sensors, and RFID readers to automatically detect and identify items on the conveyor belt, eliminating the imprecision and false positives associated with scan-gap analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system performs multiple functions simultaneously: it identifies items on the conveyor, tracks their movement, weighs them, reads RFID tags, and compares them against the scan log. This multi-functional approach provides comprehensive detection capability that far exceeds the single-function scan-gap analysis, improving both detection difficulty and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If manual item scanning by operators is used, then item identification is achieved, but operator error or intentional fraud allows items to pass through unscanned

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning operation simplicityVSAvoiditem scanning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing the automated sensor array to perform the verification function that would otherwise require careful manual monitoring by operators. The cameras, weight sensors, and RFID readers independently verify that items are scanned, removing reliance on operator attention and integrity. The system essentially monitors itself to ensure accurate scanning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

An intermediary automated verification system is introduced between the operator's scanning actions and the final transaction completion. This intermediary independently detects items on the conveyor and verifies they match the scan log, providing objective verification that prevents both accidental errors and intentional fraud by operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If multiple detection methods are combined to reduce false positives, then detection reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple detection technologies (cameras, weight sensors, RFID readers) into a single integrated detection system that operates as a unified whole. Rather than implementing separate independent systems, the components work together synergistically, with each sensor type complementing the others to provide robust detection while sharing common processing and control infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves multi-functionality through a single integrated platform that performs item identification, weight measurement, RFID reading, and transaction verification simultaneously. This universal detection system handles multiple detection tasks through shared hardware and software resources, reducing overall system complexity compared to implementing separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11416902B2Notification system and methods for use in retail environments
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 NCR VOYIX CORP
  • US11416902B2 patent drawing
  • US11416902B2 patent drawing
  • US11416902B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A scan avoidance monitoring system detects instances in which a respective customer in a retail environment fails to properly scan or tally one or more retail items for purchase. To avoid generating false positives, such as flagging of events as scan avoidances when they really are not or likely are not scan avoidances, the scan avoidance system can be configured to require a level of confirmation by one or more other analyzers to flag a particular circumstance as a scan avoidance.