3D Scan Registration via Cluster Segmentation and Pairwise Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for registering multiple scans in laser scanning and measurement systems often experience interruptions due to performance limitations, leading to incomplete or ambiguous registrations, especially when not all scans are examined pairwise.

Innovation Solution

The method involves generating clusters from scans based on quality criteria, allowing for automatic or user-assisted selection and registration of clusters, with optional user confirmations to ensure accurate joining of clusters and scans, thereby improving the registration process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If all scans are examined pairwise for registration, then registration accuracy is improved, but processing time and computational resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregistration accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scan data into clusters based on spatial proximity and temporal continuity. By dividing the complete set of scans into smaller cluster groups, the system performs pairwise examination only within each cluster rather than across all scans globally. This segmentation maintains registration accuracy for scans that are spatially and temporally related while dramatically reducing the total number of pairwise comparisons required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by examining only a subset of scan pairs that are most likely to be related based on temporal and spatial criteria. Instead of performing exhaustive pairwise examination of all possible scan combinations, the system selectively processes scans within defined clusters, achieving sufficient registration accuracy for the application while avoiding the computational burden of complete examination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Productivity

If only neighborhood scans are examined for registration, then processing performance is improved, but registration completeness and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing performanceVSAvoidregistration completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary organization of scans into clusters based on temporal and spatial relationships before the registration process. By pre-grouping scans that are likely to be related into clusters, the system ensures that relevant scans are identified and processed together, preventing interruptions and maintaining registration completeness while preserving processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where registration results from initial cluster processing inform subsequent processing decisions. If registration within a cluster achieves satisfactory results, the system can proceed efficiently; if not, it can adjust cluster definitions or processing parameters to improve reliability, thus maintaining both performance and completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If automatic clustering is performed without user intervention, then automation level is improved, but handling of ambiguous or insufficient information worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidhandling of ambiguous information
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic registration system that adapts its automation level based on the quality and clarity of the data. When scan information is clear and unambiguous, the system operates fully automatically with high productivity. When information is ambiguous or insufficient, the system dynamically transitions to a semi-automatic mode, presenting options to the user for confirmation or correction, thus maintaining reliability across varying data conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters based on data quality assessment. When information is sufficient and clear, automation parameters are set to maximum efficiency. When information is ambiguous or insufficient, the system adjusts parameters to reduce automation level and increase user involvement, ensuring reliable handling of challenging cases while maintaining high automation for routine cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9245346B2Registering of a scene disintegrating into clusters with pairs of scans
Publication Date: 2016.01.26 FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US9245346B2 patent drawing
  • US9245346B2 patent drawing
  • US9245346B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for optically scanning and measuring a scene by a three-dimensional (3D) measurement device in which multiple scans are generated to then be registered in a joint coordinate system of the scene. At first at least one cluster is generated from at least one scan, further scans are registered for test purposes in the coordinate system of the cluster, and registering is then confirmed if specified quality criteria are fulfilled and the generated clusters are then joined, for which purpose pairs are formed of selected scans and/or clusters to form pairs, the pairs are registered for test purposes and registering is confirmed if appropriate.