Monolithic Scan Mirror Conversion Bonding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for forming scan mirrors often result in failures at the mounting bracket due to the optical and support sections being formed as a single unit, requiring separate molds or machining processes for each size, shape, and orientation, limiting flexibility and increasing costs.

Innovation Solution

The process involves forming separate optical and support sections from a precursor material like graphite, which are then assembled and simultaneously converted into a ceramic silicon carbide material, utilizing grain growth to bond the sections and form a monolithic structure, allowing for interchangeable components with varying sizes and orientations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the optical and support sections are formed as a single unit by machining or casting, then the mirror structure is simple and strong, but the mounting bracket becomes a failure point and requires separate molds for each size and shape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting bracket reliabilityVSAvoidmirror size and shape flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The mirror is divided into separate optical section and support section components that are formed independently from graphite precursors, then assembled and converted to ceramic. This segmentation allows the support bracket to be designed as a separate optimized component rather than being constrained by single-piece manufacturing, eliminating the failure point while maintaining versatility through modular assembly of different optical and support sections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If separate molds or machining processes are used for each mirror size and shape, then the mirror can be customized, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemirror size and shape flexibilityVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

A universal support section design with standardized mounting features can be used across multiple mirror configurations. The modular approach allows the same support section to accommodate different optical sections of varying sizes and shapes, eliminating the need for separate molds for each configuration and simplifying manufacturing while maintaining customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The optical and support sections are formed separately from graphite precursors using standardized processes before assembly. This preliminary formation of interchangeable components allows for optimized mass production of modular sections that can be assembled in various configurations, reducing the need for custom tooling and simplifying the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the optical and support sections are assembled before conversion to ceramic, then component flexibility and interchangeability are improved, but the bonding strength at the interface may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent interchangeabilityVSAvoidinterface bonding strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The conversion process transforms the physical and chemical parameters of the assembled graphite components, converting them to ceramic silicon carbide. This parameter change during conversion creates a monolithic structure where the interface between previously separate components becomes indistinguishable, achieving bonding strength equal to or greater than single-piece converted structures while maintaining the benefits of modular assembly and component interchangeability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances the strength and reliability of scan mirrors by forming a seamless bond between sections, reducing thermal mass while maintaining high strength, and eliminates the need for expensive tooling and long lead times, enabling more flexible and cost-effective production.

Implementation Method 1

As graphite is converted from graphite crystal structure to a larger crystal silicon carbide structure, grain growth allows bonding of components during conversion as the grains grow across the interface of adjoining parts.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGrain growth:

Data Source

PatentEP1946155B1System, method and apparatus for conversion bonding of precursor subcomponents into a unitary monolith
Publication Date: 2017.06.14 POCO GRAPHITE INC
  • EP1946155B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1946155B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP1946155B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A process for converting precursor objects into a unitary ceramic object produces, for example, a ceramic, optical scan mirror that is formed from at least two pieces. An optical section has at least one optical surface and at least one attachment surface, and a support section has at least one attachment surface and preferably has a mounting area. The optical and support sections are formed as separate pieces from a precursor material, such as graphite, such that a selected support section can receive any of a plurality of optical sections having different sizes, shapes, or orientations. To form the mirror, the attachment surfaces are placed adjacent each other, and then the sections are converted simultaneously to a ceramic material, such as silicon carbide, to form a monolithic scan mirror.