Scan Position Identifier for MRI Subject Support

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical imaging techniques require extra steps and time to define scan start and end positions, often leading to unnecessary patient dose and inefficiency due to reliance on technologist judgment and manual adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A movable subject support with a scan position identifier that generates signals for start and end scan positions based on the location of the subject, allowing for independent alignment and reduced need for manual adjustments, thereby simplifying the scanning process and optimizing scan volume accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual positioning techniques are used to define scan start and end positions, then the scan can be performed, but extra steps and time are consumed and patient dose increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning throughputVSAvoidtime to define scan positions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The subject support automatically identifies scan positions using markers and sensors without requiring technologist intervention for manual positioning. The system self-determines the start and end positions based on detected marker locations, eliminating the need for technologists to manually position the support or calculate scan parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical positioning with an automated optical/electronic detection system. Instead of technologists visually aligning lasers or manually moving the support, sensors detect marker positions and automatically calculate scan parameters, substituting mechanical/manual operations with automated detection and computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If default scan length is used, then scanning is simplified, but unnecessary patient dose is administered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan setup simplicityVSAvoidpatient radiation dose
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from marker detection to automatically determine the optimal scan length. Sensors detect the positions of markers placed on the patient, and this information feeds into the scan parameter calculation, allowing the system to adjust the scan length to match the actual patient anatomy rather than using a fixed default value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes scan parameters (start position, end position, length) based on detected marker locations. Instead of using a fixed default scan length, the system calculates and adjusts the scan parameters to match the specific patient and examination requirements, optimizing the radiation dose for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If technologist manually monitors and stops the scan in real-time, then scan coverage can be optimized, but the process requires close attention and reaction time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan coverage accuracyVSAvoidoperator attention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically determines and executes the optimal scan parameters without requiring continuous technologist monitoring. The automated marker detection and parameter calculation system performs the function that would otherwise require manual real-time supervision, freeing the technologist from intense focus during the scanning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple manual adjustment steps are required to define scan positions, then positioning can be performed, but device complexity and操作流程 complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescan position accuracyVSAvoidpositioning procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex manual positioning steps and replaces them with a simplified marker-based system. Instead of requiring technologists to perform multiple manual adjustments and calculations, the system uses detected marker positions to directly determine scan parameters, removing the intermediate complex steps while maintaining or improving positioning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS8995611B2Scan start and/or end position identifier
Publication Date: 2015.03.31 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • US8995611B2 patent drawing
  • US8995611B2 patent drawing
  • US8995611B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A subject support (118) for an imaging system (100) includes a moveable portion (122) that includes a surface (204) on which the subject is loaded and that is configured to move into an examination region of the imaging system where the subject is to be scanned. The support further includes a scan position identifier (126) that generates a signal indicative of at least one of a start scan position or an end scan position for a predetermined region of interest of the subject based on a location of the region of interest on the moveable portion of the subject support for an arbitrary relative position of the moveable portion with respect to the examination region.