Scanner Cover Hinge Mechanism for Smooth Pivoting and Rattle Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing image reading apparatuses experience poor operability and rattling issues when opening and closing the cover due to inadequate hinge mechanisms, which affect the smooth movement between closed and open positions.

Innovation Solution

The image reading apparatus employs a hinge mechanism with a first hinge having an urging member to maintain the cover at a pivoted position, and additional hinges positioned relative to the cover's center of gravity and handle to reduce frictional resistance, ensuring smooth operation and preventing rattling. This configuration includes a first hinge with an urging member, a second hinge closer to the center of gravity, and a third hinge positioned opposite to the first hinge, all connected to the scanner housing to facilitate smooth pivoting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a hinge mechanism is added to enable cover pivoting, then operability is improved, but rattling occurs due to insufficient frictional resistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover pivoting operabilityVSAvoidrattling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the frictional resistance parameter by adding a frictional resistance generation portion (protrusion and groove structure) to the hinge mechanism. This increases the frictional resistance to prevent rattling while maintaining smooth pivoting operation, directly resolving the contradiction between operability and rattling prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If the hinge mechanism is positioned closer to the center of gravity, then stability is improved, but frictional resistance increases reducing operability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover positioning stabilityVSAvoidcover pivoting smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating a specific frictional resistance generation portion only at the necessary location in the hinge mechanism. The protrusion and groove structure is localized to generate frictional resistance precisely where needed to prevent rattling, while other parts of the hinge maintain low friction for smooth operation, thus resolving the contradiction between stability and operability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Ease of operation

If multiple hinges are added to reduce frictional resistance, then device complexity increases, but manufacturing cost rises

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecover pivoting smoothnessVSAvoidhinge mechanism structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the frictional resistance generation function with the existing hinge structure by incorporating a protrusion and groove structure within the hinge components themselves. This integration eliminates the need for separate friction-reducing mechanisms or additional hinges, thereby maintaining operational smoothness while avoiding increased device complexity and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances operability by reducing frictional resistance and preventing rattling, allowing the cover to open and close smoothly, thereby improving user interaction and maintaining accurate positional alignment between the reading sensor and conveyed sheets.

Implementation Method 1

The first hinge further includes an urging member configured to exert an urging force between the base member and the pivot member so as to maintain the cover at a pivoted positon between the closed position and the open position.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The hinge mechanism further includes a second hinge disposed closer to the center of gravity in the first direction than the first hinge. The first hinge further includes an urging member configured to exert an urging force between the base member and the pivot member so as to maintain the cover at a pivoted positon between the closed position and the open position.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS10178253B2Image reading apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.01.08 BROTHER KOGYO KK
  • US10178253B2 patent drawing
  • US10178253B2 patent drawing
  • US10178253B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image reading apparatus includes a reading unit, a cover, and a hinge mechanism connecting the cover to the reading unit pivotably about a pivot axis which extends in a first direction. A center of gravity of the cover is closer to a first end of the cover in a first direction than to a second end of the cover. A first hinge is spaced from the center of gravity toward the second end of the cover in the first direction. A second hinge is disposed closer to the center of gravity in the first direction than the first hinge. The first hinge includes a base member disposed movably in the reading unit, a pivot member coupled to the cover, and an urging member exerting an urging force between the base member and the pivot member so as to maintain the cover at a pivoted position.