3D Scanning Proficiency Evaluation System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the field of 3D scanning and modeling, particularly in dental industries, there is a need to evaluate user proficiency effectively, as handheld scanners require training and lack practical evaluation methods for obtaining precise 3D data of oral cavities.

Innovation Solution

A data processing method that involves loading sample data of a training model into a user interface, matching scan data with sample data, and evaluating the scan data to improve user proficiency through qualitative and quantitative assessments, with adjustable difficulty levels and marker units for guided training.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a handheld type scanner is used to obtain 3D data, then portability and flexibility are improved, but scanning precision deteriorates because user proficiency directly affects data quality

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveportabilityVSAvoidscanning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback by comparing user-acquired scan data with reference data from expert scans. The comparison results, including similarity metrics and visual overlays, guide users to improve their scanning technique iteratively, thereby enhancing scanning precision while maintaining handheld portability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Reference scan data from experts is pre-acquired and stored in the system before actual use. This preliminary preparation of high-quality reference data enables immediate comparison and guidance during user scanning operations, eliminating the need for users to independently achieve expert-level precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If users scan actual patient oral cavities to improve proficiency, then practical experience is gained, but the ability to objectively evaluate scanning proficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning proficiencyVSAvoidproficiency evaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of relying on actual patient scans for evaluation, the system uses copied reference data from expert scans of training models. These reference copies provide standardized benchmarks that enable objective proficiency evaluation without requiring real patient involvement in the training process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

Training models serve as intermediaries between users and actual patient scans. Users practice on training models with objective evaluation, then apply skills to real patients. The training model acts as a mediator that provides measurable feedback without the complexity and variability of actual patient oral cavities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Speed

If scan data is evaluated without reference to sample data, then scanning speed is improved, but evaluation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidevaluation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

Reference scan data is pre-acquired and pre-processed before actual evaluation operations. This preliminary preparation enables rapid comparison and accurate evaluation during actual scanning operations, as the reference data is already ready for immediate use

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual expert evaluation with automated computer-based comparison algorithms. The automated system objectively compares scan data with reference data using computational methods, providing both speed and accuracy without requiring manual review of each scan

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20230346524A1Data processing method
Publication Date: 2023.11.02 MEDIT CORP
  • US20230346524A1 patent drawing
  • US20230346524A1 patent drawing
  • US20230346524A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A data processing method according to the present invention comprises the step of: loading at least a part of sample data corresponding to a training model into a user interface; matching the sample data with scan data obtained by scanning the training model; and assessing the scan data on the basis of a result of the matching between the scan data and the sample data.