Scatter Symbol State Management for Linear Jackpot Returns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current gaming systems face challenges in providing linear returns for progressive jackpots, as players contributing to a common prize pool may not receive proportional winnings, and existing technologies struggle to make jackpot gameplay both entertaining and achievable.

Innovation Solution

A method for triggering jackpots using scatter symbols that are randomly displayed across the screen, with their active state probabilistically determined based on the player's wager relative to the maximum wager, allowing for proportional jackpot payouts regardless of the number of scatter symbols present.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If a common prize pool is used for progressive jackpots funded by multiple machines, then the jackpot amount increases and becomes more attractive to players, but the linearity of returns is compromised as players may not receive proportional winnings to their contributions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvejackpot pool sizeVSAvoidlinearity of returns
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of symbol state (active vs. inactive) based on wager size. Maximum wagers produce more active scatter symbols, creating proportional winning opportunities. This resolves the contradiction by allowing a large common prize pool while maintaining linearity through dynamic parameter adjustment of symbol states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If scatter symbols are always active regardless of wager size, then the game is simple to play, but the linearity requirement is violated as small wagers have the same jackpot chance as maximum wagers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegameplay simplicityVSAvoidproportional returns
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the scatter symbols dynamic by changing their state (active/inactive) based on the wager amount. The system automatically adjusts the number of active scatter symbols proportionally to the wager size, maintaining both simplicity for the player and linearity for returns without complex calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the probability of scatter symbols being active is proportional to wager size, then linearity is maintained, but the game complexity increases due to probabilistic symbol states

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelinear returnsVSAvoidsymbol state management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically determining the state of each scatter symbol based on the wager amount. The processor independently evaluates each symbol and assigns active or inactive states without requiring player input or complex external management, simplifying the overall system while maintaining linearity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS9171423B2Linear scatter jackpot method and system
Publication Date: 2015.10.27 BALLY TECH ANZ
  • US9171423B2 patent drawing
  • US9171423B2 patent drawing
  • US9171423B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for awarding a jackpot, and a corresponding gaming machine and system are disclosed. The jackpot is awarded based upon the presence of scatter symbols appearing in the game outcome in a predefined manner. The jackpot is preferred to be linked across multiple machines. In a preferred form, scatter symbols on one reel may be in an active or inactive state, the jackpot is awarded only if they are in the active state, and the probability of them being in an active state is dependent upon the size of the player's wager, so as to provide linear returns to players.