Scattered Radiation Correction Using Virtual Reference Image

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for correcting scattered radiation in three-dimensional medical images are prone to errors and require mechanical interventions or prior knowledge of the object's materials, leading to suboptimal image quality and potential removal of medically relevant structures.

Innovation Solution

A method that uses a virtual three-dimensional reference image and an adaptive scattering model to correct scattered radiation in three-dimensional medical images, without mechanical intervention, by iteratively subtracting the scattering model from the projection images and comparing the results with the reference image until a quality parameter meets an abort criterion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If an anti-scatter grid is positioned in front of the detector to filter scattered radiation, then scattered radiation is reduced, but direct radiation is also filtered out requiring higher dose

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered radiationVSAvoidradiation dose
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the scattering effect from the projection images by determining a scattering model that represents scattered radiation and subtracting it from the measured projection images. This eliminates scattered radiation without requiring physical filters that would also block direct radiation and increase dose.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical anti-scatter grid system with a computational approach. Instead of using physical hardware to filter radiation, the method uses software-based scattering model determination and subtraction to remove scattered radiation effects from the images.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If large distance is provided between object and detector to reduce scattered radiation, then scattered radiation is reduced, but magnification increases requiring large expensive detectors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered radiationVSAvoiddetector area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical solution of increasing object-detector distance with a computational method. The scattering model subtraction technique allows scattered radiation reduction without changing the physical geometry of the imaging system, thereby maintaining appropriate magnification and detector size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If trained function is applied to remove scattered radiation from projection images, then scattered radiation is reduced, but medically relevant structures may be removed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered radiationVSAvoidmedical accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by determining the scattering model before subtracting it from the projection images. The scattering model is determined based on the specific object and imaging conditions, allowing tailored correction that preserves medically relevant structures while removing scattered radiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces error-prone trained functions with a physics-based scattering model determination approach. This computational method uses the actual imaging geometry and object characteristics to model scattered radiation, providing more reliable and accurate correction compared to generic trained functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If Boltzmann transport equation is solved to model scattered radiation, then scattered radiation can be corrected, but the method is computationally intensive and prone to error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered radiationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameters and complexity of the scattering model to be more computationally efficient. Instead of solving the full Boltzmann transport equation, the method uses a simplified scattering model determination that is adapted to the specific imaging situation, reducing computational complexity while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by using a simplified scattering model that addresses the most significant scattered radiation effects without attempting to model all possible scattering interactions. This provides sufficient correction for medical imaging purposes while avoiding excessive computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

5Object-affected harmful factors

If low-frequency function is used to model scattered radiation with iterative adaptation, then scattered radiation can be corrected, but prior knowledge of materials is required and it is computationally intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescattered radiationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the approach from using low-frequency functions with iterative material-based adaptation to a scattering model determination that does not require prior knowledge of object materials. The model is determined directly from the imaging geometry and measured data, simplifying the computational process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the scattering model directly from the imaging situation without requiring extraction or input of material composition information. This eliminates the need for prior knowledge of object materials while still providing accurate scattered radiation correction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20250078209A1Method for scattered radiation correction
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US20250078209A1 patent drawing
  • US20250078209A1 patent drawing
  • US20250078209A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for scattered radiation correction, comprises: receiving a plurality of projection images mapping an object; receiving or determining a virtual three-dimensional reference image mapping the object; determining at least one scattering model; subtracting the at least one scattering model from the projection images to determine corrected projection images; determining a corrected medical image as a function of the corrected projection images; comparing the corrected image with the virtual reference image; and checking whether an abort criteria is met. If the abort criteria is met, then the corrected medical image is provided. If the abort criteria is not met, then the at least one scattering model is adapted and the method is repeated based on the adapted scattering model.