Autonomous Vehicle Scenario Modules for Shared Control Decisions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in effectively managing operational scenarios within vehicle transportation networks due to the complexity of navigating diverse environmental conditions and external factors, such as pedestrians and traffic rules, without integrated real-time data sharing and scenario-specific control strategies.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle system that identifies distinct operational scenarios, communicates scenario-specific operational control management data with an external system, and operates scenario-specific operational control evaluation modules to generate and execute vehicle control actions, leveraging models like Partially Observable Markov Decision Process (POMDP) for decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicles use integrated real-time data sharing and scenario-specific control strategies, then navigation safety and efficiency are improved, but system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the autonomous vehicle control system into distinct scenario-specific modules (e.g., pedestrian crossing scenarios, intersection scenarios, highway merging scenarios). Each module contains specialized control strategies and evaluation models tailored to specific operational contexts, allowing the system to handle complexity through modular organization rather than monolithic design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an external shared scenario-specific operational control management system that acts as an intermediary. This external system receives operational data from multiple autonomous vehicles, processes it centrally, and returns refined control strategies. This mediator handles the computational burden of aggregating and analyzing data from multiple sources, reducing the complexity burden on individual vehicle systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If autonomous vehicles process and share operational experience data in real-time, then decision-making accuracy is improved, but communication bandwidth and processing time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements pre-processing and filtering of operational experience data before it is shared across the network. Each vehicle pre-processes its own operational data to extract only the most relevant and valuable insights, reducing the volume of data that needs to be transmitted and processed in real-time. This preliminary action ensures that only high-quality, decision-critical information is shared, maintaining accuracy while reducing communication overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses simplified representations and models of operational scenarios rather than transmitting complete raw sensor data. Each vehicle creates compressed, scenario-specific copies of its operational experience that capture essential patterns and outcomes. These copied representations are much smaller and faster to process while retaining the decision-making value of the original full-resolution data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Manufacturing precision

If autonomous vehicles implement scenario-specific operational control evaluation models, then control precision for specific scenarios is improved, but overall system computational load increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection and instantiation of scenario-specific control evaluation models based on the current operational context. Rather than running all possible scenario models continuously, the system dynamically activates only the models relevant to the current situation (e.g., activating pedestrian crossing models only when approaching a crosswalk). This dynamic approach maintains high control precision for relevant scenarios while dramatically reducing overall computational energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies specialized, high-precision control evaluation models only to specific local scenarios where they are most needed, rather than applying uniform high-computation models to all situations. Each scenario-specific model is optimized for its particular context (e.g., intersection models focus on right-of-way logic, while highway models focus on speed and spacing), providing locally optimal control precision without the energy cost of running all models everywhere.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11874120B2Shared autonomous vehicle operational management
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 NISSAN MOTOR CO LTD
  • US11874120B2 patent drawing
  • US11874120B2 patent drawing
  • US11874120B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Traversing, by an autonomous vehicle, a vehicle transportation network, may include identifying a distinct vehicle operational scenario, wherein traversing the vehicle transportation network includes traversing a portion of the vehicle transportation network that includes the distinct vehicle operational scenario, communicating shared scenario-specific operational control management data associated with the distinct vehicle operational scenario with an external shared scenario-specific operational control management system, operating a scenario-specific operational control evaluation module instance including an instance of a scenario-specific operational control evaluation model of the distinct vehicle operational scenario, and wherein operating the scenario-specific operational control evaluation module instance includes identifying a policy for the scenario-specific operational control evaluation model, receiving a candidate vehicle control action from the policy for the scenario-specific operational control evaluation model, and traversing a portion of the vehicle transportation network based on the candidate vehicle control action.