Autonomous Vehicle Control Using Scenario-Specific Evaluation Modules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in effectively navigating complex transportation networks due to the lack of efficient methods for real-time scenario-specific control, leading to potential safety and operational inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a method where an autonomous vehicle uses scenario-specific operational control evaluation modules, such as Partially Observable Markov Decision Process models, to process sensor information and generate candidate vehicle control actions based on detected operational scenarios, enabling informed decision-making for safe and efficient navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single general-purpose control system is used for autonomous vehicles, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to handle diverse operational scenarios and measurement precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system structureVSAvoidscenario recognition accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple specialized operational control evaluation modules, each dedicated to a specific operational scenario (e.g., pedestrian crossing, intersection navigation, highway merging). This segmentation allows each module to achieve high measurement precision for its designated scenario while the overall system manages complexity through modular organization rather than a single monolithic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If multiple scenario-specific control modules are implemented, then operational efficiency and safety improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol system architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a universal framework architecture that can instantiate multiple scenario-specific modules. The framework provides common functionalities (sensor integration, action execution, scenario detection) that serve all specialized modules, allowing the system to achieve high operational efficiency through scenario-specific processing while managing complexity through shared universal components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically selects and activates appropriate scenario-specific modules based on real-time operational conditions detected by sensors. This dynamic adaptation allows the system to maintain high operational efficiency by using only the necessary modules for current scenarios, rather than continuously running all modules, thereby managing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If real-time sensor processing is performed, then operational safety improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial processing by activating only the specific operational control evaluation modules needed for current scenarios rather than processing all possible scenarios continuously. This partial action approach maintains operational safety by thoroughly processing relevant scenarios while reducing overall computational energy consumption by excluding irrelevant processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP3580620B1Autonomous vehicle operational management control
Publication Date: 2023.09.06 NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC
  • EP3580620B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3580620B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3580620B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Autonomous vehicle operational management may include traversing, by an autonomous vehicle, a vehicle transportation network. Traversing the vehicle transportation network may include receiving, from a sensor of the autonomous vehicle, sensor information corresponding to an external object within a defined distance of the autonomous vehicle, identifying a distinct vehicle operational scenario in response to receiving the sensor information, instantiating a scenario-specific operational control evaluation module instance, wherein the scenario-specific operational control evaluation module instance is an instance of a scenario-specific operational control evaluation module modeling the distinct vehicle operational scenario, receiving a candidate vehicle control action from the scenario-specific operational control evaluation module instance, and traversing a portion of the vehicle transportation network based on the candidate vehicle control action.