Navigation Scenic View Routing Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital mapping systems fail to accurately route users to destinations while ensuring views of specific types of geographical features, such as mountains or waterfalls, along the route.

Innovation Solution

A geographical feature scoring engine assigns categorical scores to road segments or locations based on the extent to which particular types of geographical features can be viewed, using metrics like distance, visibility, size, count, popularity, and diversity, to provide navigation and map data that prioritizes user-specified geographical feature types.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the navigation system selects the shortest route to the destination, then the travel time is minimized, but the user cannot guarantee views of specific geographical features along the route

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidability to view specific geographical features
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the route into multiple candidate routes, each evaluated for both travel time and geographical feature visibility. The system divides the routing problem into separate evaluations: one for efficiency (time) and one for scenic quality (feature visibility), then combines these evaluations to provide multiple routed options that balance both criteria.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic route selection by providing multiple routed options rather than a single fixed route. The system dynamically evaluates candidate routes based on real-time criteria including travel time and geographical feature visibility, allowing users to select from different route characteristics (fastest vs. most scenic) based on their current preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the navigation system prioritizes routes with views of specific geographical features, then user experience is enhanced, but the route duration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser experienceVSAvoidroute duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by providing multiple routed options with varying degrees of scenic quality rather than forcing users to choose between completely scenic routes (excessive scenic action) or completely efficient routes. The system generates candidate routes with different balances of travel time and feature visibility, allowing users to select the appropriate level of scenic emphasis for their needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the evaluation parameters from a single criterion (travel time) to multiple criteria (travel time, geographical feature visibility, route characteristics). By introducing additional parameters for evaluating route quality, the system enables users to optimize for different combinations of parameters based on their preferences, transforming the routing problem from time-only optimization to multi-parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system evaluates multiple candidate routes based on geographical feature visibility, then route selection accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute selection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-identifying and evaluating multiple candidate routes before presenting them to the user. The system performs preliminary calculations of travel time, distance, and geographical feature visibility for each candidate route in advance, so that when users request route options, the computationally intensive evaluation work has already been completed. This reduces the real-time computational burden while maintaining high selection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates simplified copies or representations of the routing problem for each candidate route evaluation. Rather than performing complex real-time analysis, the system uses pre-computed data structures and models that represent route characteristics, allowing for efficient comparison and selection. The detailed geographical feature data and route attributes are copied into standardized formats that enable rapid evaluation across multiple candidates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250076063A1Navigation-integrated scenic location value and route planning
Publication Date: 2025.03.06 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20250076063A1 patent drawing
  • US20250076063A1 patent drawing
  • US20250076063A1 patent drawing

AI summary

To provide navigation directions in response to a request for viewing a particular type of geographical feature on a route to a destination, a computing device receives a request for navigation directions from a starting location to a destination that specifies a particular type of geographical feature for viewing on a route to the destination. The computing device identifies at least one candidate route for navigating to the destination location that includes a road segment from which the particular type of geographical feature can be viewed, and selects a route from the set of candidate routes based at least in part on an extent to which the particular type of geographical feature can be viewed from each candidate route. Then the computing device provides a set of navigation directions for presentation on a client device for navigating to the destination location via the selected route.