Schedule Migration Validation for Mainframe and Distributed Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing workflow automation systems struggle to efficiently migrate and validate schedules between mainframe and distributed systems due to differences in job naming conventions and linkage configurations, leading to scheduling inconsistencies and potential disruptions.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for migrating and validating schedules that includes cleansing and preprocessing source and target schedules, identifying correct predecessor jobs, and using pattern matching techniques to ensure proper linkage configurations, with a user-friendly interface for end-users to facilitate accurate validation and migration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If schedule migration is performed between different workflow automation systems, then job scheduling capability is transferred, but scheduling inconsistencies and validation errors occur due to different job naming conventions and linkage configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule migration capabilityVSAvoidscheduling consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms job names from different naming conventions into a standardized format by changing parameters such as job name length, character sets, and naming patterns. This allows schedules to be migrated between workflow automation systems with different job naming conventions while maintaining scheduling consistency and validity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary validation layer that mediates between the source schedule and target scheduler. This intermediary component validates job linkages, predecessor-successor relationships, and schedule configurations before migration, preventing scheduling inconsistencies from occurring during the migration process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If manual validation of migrated schedules is performed, then scheduling accuracy can be verified, but time consumption and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveschedule validation accuracyVSAvoidvalidation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service validation by automatically checking schedule validity, job linkage correctness, and predecessor-successor relationships during the migration process. This eliminates the need for manual validation while maintaining high accuracy, significantly reducing validation time and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated feedback mechanisms that immediately identify and report validation errors, linkage issues, and scheduling inconsistencies during migration. This real-time feedback allows for instant correction of problems without requiring manual intervention, maintaining high validation accuracy while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If comprehensive schedule validation is performed to identify all discrepancies, then migration accuracy is improved, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemigration accuracyVSAvoidvalidation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is segmented into multiple independent validation modules, each responsible for specific aspects such as job name validation, linkage validation, predecessor-successor relationship validation, and schedule configuration validation. This segmentation maintains comprehensive validation accuracy while reducing overall system complexity through modular design and independent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250208921A1Systems, Methods And Interfaces for Schedule Migration And Validation for Distributed Systems And Mainframe Systems
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
  • US20250208921A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208921A1 patent drawing
  • US20250208921A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are provided for migrating and/or validating schedules for mainframe systems and/or distributed systems. The method may include interfacing with a plurality of schedulers including a source scheduler and a target scheduler. Each scheduler may be configured to schedule jobs across one or more distributed systems and one or more mainframe systems. The method may include obtaining a source schedule generated by the source scheduler and a target schedule generated by the target scheduler for a same system of the one or more distributed systems and one or more mainframe systems. The method may include determining validity of migration of jobs between the source schedule and the target schedule. The method may include, in accordance with a determination that one or more jobs in the target schedule are not valid, transmitting an indication to the target scheduler causing the target scheduler to correct the schedule.