Scheduling Request Processing in NTN With Uplink Synchronization Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In scenarios where a terminal device is out of uplink synchronization, existing methods for processing scheduling requests (SR) result in power waste and resource inefficiency due to the initiation of random access procedures or SR transmission, which cannot be successfully received by the access network.

Innovation Solution

Implement a method where the terminal device sends an SR only when it has a valid PUCCH resource and receives no uplink synchronization loss indication, thereby preventing SR transmission in out-of-synchronization states to conserve power and resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the terminal device sends SR when it has a valid PUCCH resource but is out of uplink synchronization, then the SR transmission can be performed, but the access network device cannot successfully receive the SR due to loss of uplink synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSR reception reliabilityVSAvoidpower waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal device checks uplink synchronization status before sending SR. By performing this check in advance (preliminary action), the device prevents sending SR when out of synchronization, avoiding both failed reception and unnecessary power consumption. The synchronization check is performed prior to the SR transmission decision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses uplink synchronization status as feedback to control SR transmission. The terminal device monitors synchronization state and uses this feedback information to determine whether to send SR, ensuring that SR is only transmitted when the uplink synchronization status indicates successful reception conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the terminal device initiates random access procedure when out of uplink synchronization, then the device can attempt to re-establish synchronization, but this consumes additional time and resources that could be avoided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization recoveryVSAvoidaccess latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The terminal device checks uplink synchronization status before initiating random access procedure. By performing this check in advance, the device avoids unnecessary random access when already synchronized, reducing access latency while still enabling timely synchronization recovery when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of always initiating random access procedure, the terminal device performs a partial check (synchronization status verification) before committing to the full random access procedure. This partial action filters out cases where random access is unnecessary, reducing overall access latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If the terminal device sends SR without checking synchronization status, then the transmission process is simplified, but the access network device cannot successfully receive the SR when the device is out of synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSR transmission simplicityVSAvoidSR reception success
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A synchronization status check is performed as a preliminary action before SR transmission. This simple check does not complicate the overall SR transmission process significantly but ensures that SR is only sent when reception conditions are met, maintaining both simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the terminal device continuously monitors uplink synchronization status, then the device can avoid sending SR when out of synchronization, but this increases device complexity and processing overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynchronization awarenessVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous monitoring, the terminal device performs a partial check of synchronization status only at critical decision points (before SR transmission and before random access initiation). This reduced monitoring approach maintains synchronization awareness where needed while minimizing processing overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250254695A1Scheduling request processing method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.08.07 HUAWEI TECH CO LTD
  • US20250254695A1 patent drawing
  • US20250254695A1 patent drawing
  • US20250254695A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A scheduling request processing method and apparatus are applicable to a non-terrestrial network NTN scenario. The method includes: A first entity determines that a first scheduling request SR in a pending state exists. When a first condition is satisfied, the first entity indicates a second entity to send the first SR. The first condition includes: The first entity has an SR transmission occasion on a valid physical uplink control channel PUCCH resource for SR configured, and the first entity receives no uplink synchronization loss indication. Based on this solution, when the first entity has the SR transmission occasion on the valid PUCCH resource for SR configured, to indicate the second entity to send the first SR, at least a condition that the first entity receives no uplink synchronization loss indication needs to be satisfied.