Scheduling Requests for Spatial Multiplexing Radar Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wireless communication systems face challenges in efficiently managing scheduling requests for spatial multiplexing, particularly in avoiding interference between radar sensing and uplink or sidelink communications.

Innovation Solution

A method where user equipment (UE) transmits scheduling requests indicating beam directions, beamwidths, and angular areas of interest for radar sensing, allowing the network entity to grant resources for specific radar sensing transmit beams that minimize interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If time-frequency resources are allocated for radar sensing, then radar sensing capability is improved, but uplink communication resources are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar sensing capabilityVSAvoiduplink communication resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces spatial dimension (beam directions) as a new resource dimension for multiplexing. Instead of only time-frequency multiplexing, the system now multiplexes radar sensing and uplink communications in the spatial domain by assigning different beam directions to different UEs, enabling simultaneous operation without increasing time-frequency resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges radar sensing and uplink communication operations into the same time-frequency resources by using spatial separation through beamforming. Multiple UEs can perform radar sensing and uplink transmissions simultaneously on overlapping time-frequency resources as long as their beam directions are sufficiently separated to avoid interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If spatial multiplexing is implemented for radar sensing, then resource efficiency is improved, but interference between radar sensing and communications increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidinterference between radar sensing and communications
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where UEs report their intended beam directions for radar sensing to the network entity. The network entity uses this feedback information to determine appropriate beam directions for uplink communications and to schedule resources, thereby avoiding interference while maximizing spatial multiplexing opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic beam direction selection and switching based on real-time interference conditions. The system can dynamically adjust beam directions and resource allocations to adapt to changing spatial interference scenarios, allowing flexible optimization of the trade-off between resource efficiency and interference avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If beam direction information is collected from UEs, then spatial multiplexing accuracy is improved, but signaling overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial multiplexing accuracyVSAvoidsignaling overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the beam direction indication mechanism universal by allowing UEs to indicate beam directions for multiple purposes: radar sensing resource scheduling, uplink communication scheduling, and interference avoidance. This multi-functional approach reduces the need for separate signaling mechanisms and minimizes overall overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by collecting and processing only the essential beam direction information needed for spatial multiplexing decisions, rather than requiring complete spatial characterization data. The system processes sufficient beam direction indicators to achieve accurate spatial separation while minimizing data collection and signaling requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250151045A1Scheduling requests for spatial multiplexing
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20250151045A1 patent drawing
  • US20250151045A1 patent drawing
  • US20250151045A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communications are described. A user equipment (UE) may transmit an uplink message (e.g., a scheduling request) indicating one or more beam directions (e.g., one beam direction, a set of beam directions, a sequence of beam directions), one or more beamwidths (e.g., for the one or more indicated beam directions), an angular area of interest for radar sensing, or a combination thereof. The network entity may then provide, to the UE, a grant of resources for performing the radar sensing on specific radar sensing transmit beams (e.g., that will not interfere with other radar sensing by other UEs, uplink communications form other UEs, sidelink communications by other UEs, etc.). The UE may indicate the directions of the beams with reference to a global coordinate system. The network may configure the UE with lookup tables (LUTs) defining relationships between indices, beam directions and/or beamwidths.