Scientific Contribution Summarization via ML Disentanglement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing summarization systems fail to provide accurate summaries for scientific and technical articles, as they are often oblivious to user preferences and the specific nature of the documents, leading to summaries that do not cater to the different preferences in vocabulary and content for various user audiences, and lack effective disentanglement of background information from new contributions.

Innovation Solution

An auto-summarization system utilizing machine learning classifiers to differentiate between background information and new contributions within scientific or technical articles, generating customized summaries based on user preferences by incorporating citation information and employing a ControlCode or MultiHead approach to train NLP classifiers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing summarization systems use universal methods to generate summaries, then the summarization process is simple and fast, but the summaries fail to accurately reflect user preferences and document nature

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different summarization strategies to different sections of scientific documents. It identifies and summarizes background information separately from new contributions, applying domain-specific language models tailored to different sections. This local differentiation enables accurate summaries that reflect document nature and user preferences without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the summarization task into multiple sub-tasks: identifying background information, identifying new contributions, and generating summaries for each segment. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex documents systematically, improving accuracy while managing complexity through modular processing stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the system provides customized summaries based on user preferences, then the summaries become more relevant and accurate, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser preference adaptationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its summarization behavior based on user preferences and document characteristics. It can switch between different summary types (background-focused, contribution-focused, or balanced) and adapt the level of detail automatically. This dynamic adaptation enables versatility without requiring multiple static systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a universal framework that can handle multiple summarization tasks and user preferences through a single multi-functional platform. The same infrastructure supports different summary types, domain adaptations, and user preference configurations, reducing overall system complexity compared to separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If the system disentangles background information from new contributions, then the summary quality improves, but the processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary qualityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification and classification of background information and new contributions before generating the final summary. By pre-processing the document to segment and label different content types, the system prepares structured representations that accelerate the actual summarization process and improve quality without significant time penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Measurement precision

If the system uses domain-specific language models, then the summary accuracy for scientific documents improves, but the model training and deployment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary accuracyVSAvoidmodel complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system adapts existing language models by adjusting parameters and training data rather than creating entirely new models from scratch. It fine-tunes pre-trained models on scientific domain data, changing the model's parameters to match domain-specific terminology and styles. This approach improves accuracy while avoiding the complexity of training models from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11790184B2Systems and methods for scientific contribution summarization
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 SALESFORCE INC
  • US11790184B2 patent drawing
  • US11790184B2 patent drawing
  • US11790184B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments described herein provide natural language processing (NLP) systems and methods that provide a customized summarization of scientific or technical articles, which disentangles background information from new contributions, and summarizes the background information or the new information (or both) based on a user's preference. Specifically, the systems and methods utilize machine learning classifiers to classify portions of sentences within the article as containing background information or as containing a new contribution attributable to the article. The systems and methods then incorporate the background information in the summary or incorporate the new contribution in the summary and output the summary. In this way, the systems and methods can provide summaries of scientific literatures, which largely accelerates literature review in scientific fields.