Vertical Temperature Gradient for Scintillator Crystallization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional furnaces for melting and solidifying scintillating materials in micromechanical structures often result in bubble formation, uncontrolled nucleation, and non-uniform crystal structures, leading to image resolution issues and varied x-ray absorption and light output in x-ray detecting systems.

Innovation Solution

A system with individually controlled top and bottom heaters creates a vertical temperature gradient to control the melting and solidification of scintillating materials within micromechanical structures, preventing bubble formation and ensuring uniform crystallization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional furnace is used for melting and solidifying scintillating material, then the material can be processed, but bubbles form and voids appear in the solidified structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal qualityVSAvoidbubble formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The heating process is segmented into distinct phases: a preheating phase at lower temperature followed by a melting phase at higher temperature. This segmented temperature profile prevents rapid heating that causes bubble formation while ensuring complete melting and filling of the micromechanical structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A preheating phase is performed before the actual melting process, where the temperature is gradually increased to a level below the melting point. This preliminary action allows trapped gases to escape and the material to equilibrate, preventing bubble formation during subsequent melting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If isotropic heating is applied in a conventional furnace, then the heating process is simple, but nucleation is uncontrolled resulting in polycrystalline structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenucleation controlVSAvoidheating control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heating system provides non-uniform temperature distribution with a defined temperature gradient across the sample. This local quality difference in temperature enables controlled nucleation at specific regions, promoting single-crystal growth rather than random polycrystalline formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The heating control transitions from isotropic (uniform in all directions) to anisotropic heating by introducing a vertical temperature gradient. This dimensional change in temperature distribution enables directional control of nucleation and crystal growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Productivity

If conventional furnace heating is used, then the equipment is simple, but the heating process is slow resulting in long cycle times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction cycle timeVSAvoidthermal energy waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The heating process follows a periodic temperature profile with distinct phases: preheating, melting, holding, and cooling. This periodic action optimizes each phase for its specific purpose, reducing total cycle time while minimizing energy waste through controlled temperature transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The temperature parameters are dynamically changed throughout the process, transitioning from low temperature preheating to high temperature melting, then to controlled cooling. These parameter changes enable faster processing while maintaining crystal quality and reducing energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If uncontrolled nucleation occurs during solidification, then the process is simple, but the resulting crystal structure is non-uniform affecting x-ray absorption and light output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrystal uniformityVSAvoidsolidification control
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The solidification process utilizes feedback from the established temperature gradient to control nucleation. The gradient ensures that nucleation occurs at the coldest point and propagates directionally, providing self-regulation of the crystallization process and ensuring uniform crystal structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach achieves highly uniform and high-quality crystalline structures without voids, improving image resolution and light output while reducing production cycle time by minimizing unwanted thermal effects.

Implementation Method 1

the heaters are controlled to set a vertical temperature gradient over the sample to control the melting and solidification of the scintillating material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature gradient: Temperature Gradient

Implementation Method 2

During the melting process, the top heater is ramped up and stabilized at a temperature where no melting occurs and the bottom heater is ramped up and stabilized at a temperature where melting occurs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeating: Heating

Implementation Method 3

During the melting process, the scintillating material melts and flows into the micromechanical structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 4

During the solidification phase, the scintillating material crystallizes inside this micromechanical structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCrystallization: Crystallisation

Implementation Method 5

During the solidification phase, the temperature of the bottom heater is ramped down to enable solidification to take place starting from the bottom of the micromechanical structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSolidification: Freezing

Data Source

PatentEP3377918B1System and method for melting and solidification of scintillating material in micromechanical structures
Publication Date: 2020.01.08 VIVAMOS LTD
  • EP3377918B1 patent drawingFigure 1a
  • EP3377918B1 patent drawingFigure 1b
  • EP3377918B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

There is provided a method for melting and solidification of a scintillating material in micromechanical structures, wherein the method includes controlling the melting and solidification of the scintillating material by individually controlled heat sources, a top heater (100) and a bottom heater (200), placed above and below a process chamber (300), which includes a sample with the micromechanical structures and the scintillating material. The heaters (100, 200) are controlled to set a vertical temperature gradient over the sample to control the melting and solidification of the scintillating material. During the melting process, the top heater is ramped up and stabilized at a temperature where no melting occurs and the bottom heater is ramped up and stabilized at a temperature where melting occurs during a period of time while the scintillating material melts and flows into the micromechanical structures. During the solidification phase, the temperature of the bottom heater (200) is ramped down to enable solidification to take place starting from the bottom of the micromechanical structures.