Scout MRM Transition Control for Transferable LC-MS Assays

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional MRM workflows face challenges in reproducibility and consistency when transferring liquid chromatography (LC) methods between instruments or laboratories, requiring fine-tuning and relying on costly and time-consuming antibody development for protein assays, which affects the quantification of protein markers and drug compounds.

Innovation Solution

The use of scout or sentinel MRM transitions to trigger groups of transitions and adjust separation parameters, allowing for consistency across different instruments and laboratories without relying on retention times, thus reducing the need for costly enrichment processes and improving the robustness of LC methods.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional MRM workflow is used with fixed LC methods, then signal-to-noise ratio is improved, but retention time variability increases when transferring between instruments or laboratories

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesignal-to-noise ratioVSAvoidretention time consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of MRM transition groups based on detected retention times. Instead of using fixed retention time windows, the system continuously adapts the retention time parameters for each MRM group based on actual measurements, allowing the method to maintain reliability across different instruments while preserving the signal-to-noise benefits of targeted monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of the MRM workflow by adjusting retention time windows and transition grouping dynamically. This allows the method to accommodate variations in retention time across different laboratories and instruments while maintaining the precision benefits of MRM through adaptive parameter optimization rather than fixed settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If antibody enrichment processes are used for protein assays, then quantification accuracy is improved, but cost and time consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantification accuracyVSAvoidassay preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the antibody enrichment step from the traditional workflow by implementing a direct MRM-based quantification approach. The system achieves accurate quantification through optimized MRM transition monitoring and dynamic retention time adjustment, removing the need for costly and time-consuming antibody-based enrichment processes while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive, complex antibody reagents with a simpler, instrument-based detection approach using MRM transitions. This substitution eliminates the need for costly antibody development, purification, and storage while achieving comparable or superior quantification accuracy through direct mass spectrometric monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Adaptability or versatility

If large panels of MRM transitions are monitored simultaneously, then comprehensive screening capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreening capabilityVSAvoidMRM panel management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large panel of MRM transitions into multiple groups that can be monitored sequentially or in parallel based on retention time windows. This segmentation reduces the complexity of monitoring all transitions simultaneously while maintaining comprehensive screening capability by organizing transitions into manageable subsets that can be processed efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically manages MRM transition panels by adjusting which groups are active based on detected analytes and retention times. This dynamic management allows comprehensive screening capability while reducing operational complexity by activating only the necessary transition groups for each sample type, rather than monitoring all transitions continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If LC methods are transferred between laboratories, then collaborative research capability is improved, but method reproducibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod transferabilityVSAvoidmethod reproducibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables method transfer between laboratories by implementing dynamic parameter adjustment based on local instrument characteristics. The system adapts retention time parameters and MRM transition groups to match the specific performance of each laboratory's equipment, maintaining reproducibility across different environments while preserving the ability to transfer and collaborate on research methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach maintains consistency in LC methods, reduces the reliance on antibody purification, and enhances the ability to manage large panels of MRM transitions, providing accurate and efficient quantification of protein markers and drug compounds by compensating for retention time variability and ion suppression.

Implementation Method 1

a separation device, a tandem mass spectrometer, and a processor. The separation device separates one or more known compounds from a sample mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChromatography: Chromatography

Implementation Method 2

The ion source ionizes the separated one or more compounds received from the separation device, producing an ion beam of one or more precursor ions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIonization: Ionisation

Data Source

PatentUS20240345043A1Scout MRM for screening and diagnostic assays
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 DH TECH DEVMENT PTE
  • US20240345043A1 patent drawing
  • US20240345043A1 patent drawing
  • US20240345043A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more known compounds are separated from a mixture using a separation device that allows processor-controlled adjustment of a separation parameter. The separated compounds are ionized and, for each cycle of a plurality of cycles, a mass spectrometer executes on the ion beam a series of MRM transitions read from a list. Two or more contiguous groups of MRM transitions to be monitored separately are received. Each group includes at least one sentinel transition that identifies a next group that is to be monitored and identifies a value for the separation parameter for the next group. A first group is placed on the list. When a sentinel transition of the first group is detected, a next group identified by the sentinel transition is placed on the list and the separation parameter is adjusted to a value identified by the sentinel transition for the next group.