SCP-Mediated Secure LCS Channels Without Performance Loss

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional LCS communication security techniques are limited and degrade performance, failing to adequately secure communications between Logically Composed Systems (LCSs) across multi-tenant environments, particularly when distributed across multiple resource systems.

Innovation Solution

A System Control Processor (SCP) engine configures secure communication channels using first and second keys to facilitate secure communication between host processing systems, enabling secure transmission of communications between LCSs via a network.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional LCS communication security techniques are used, then security is provided, but performance degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments security functionality into a dedicated security processing unit that operates independently from the main LCS processing. This allows security operations to be performed in parallel without blocking or slowing down the primary computation paths, thus maintaining performance while providing security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A security processing unit acts as an intermediary between LCSs, handling all security-related operations. This intermediary manages cryptographic operations, authentication, and secure channel establishment without requiring the main LCS processing systems to be involved, preventing security overhead from degrading LCS performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If security is implemented between LCSs across multiple resource systems, then security coverage is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The security processing unit is designed as a universal component that can serve multiple LCSs across different resource systems. It provides centralized security management, authentication, and encryption services that work across the entire multi-tenant environment, eliminating the need for separate security implementations in each LCS or resource system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The security processing unit serves as a centralized intermediary that mediates all security operations between LCSs. It manages security policies, handles cryptographic operations, and establishes secure channels without requiring complex security logic to be distributed across multiple systems, thereby reducing overall system complexity while improving security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If secure communication channels are established between multiple LCSs, then security is enhanced, but communication overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcommunication overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Secure communication channels are established in advance between LCSs through the security processing unit. Authentication, key exchange, and channel setup are performed beforehand, so that when actual data communication occurs, the security mechanisms are already in place and do not add significant overhead to the communication process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The security processing unit automates security operations including authentication, key management, and channel establishment without requiring manual intervention or complex coordination between LCSs. This self-service approach reduces communication overhead by eliminating repeated authentication handshakes and manual security configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12579286B2Secure LCS communication system
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 DELL PROD LP
  • US12579286B2 patent drawing
  • US12579286B2 patent drawing
  • US12579286B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A secure LCS communication system includes a first host processing system that is configured to provide a first LCS, a second host processing system that is configured to provide a second LCS, and an SCP device that is connected to the first host processing system and that is coupled to the second host processing system via a network. The SCP device uses first keys associated with the first LCS to configure a first secure communication channel with the first host processing system, and uses second keys associated with the first LCS and the second LCS to configure a second secure communication channel with the second host processing system via the network. When the SCP device receives a communication from the first LCS via the first secure communication channel that is directed to the second LCS, it transmits the communication via the second secure communication channel to the second LCS.