SCR Catalyst Diagnostic Control via Exhaust Flow Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing NOx aftertreatment systems face challenges in accurately diagnosing malfunctioning catalysts due to transient environmental conditions, leading to potential false indications and inefficient NOx reduction.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling a malfunction catalyst diagnostic test in a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system by monitoring exhaust gas flow and estimating its effect on reductant storage, selectively disabling the test based on these conditions to differentiate between transient effects and actual malfunctions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If continuous monitoring of exhaust gas flow is performed to accurately diagnose catalyst malfunction, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst malfunction diagnosis accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses reductant storage amount as an intermediary variable to indirectly assess catalyst health. Instead of directly monitoring catalyst activity, the system estimates reductant storage based on exhaust gas flow conditions and compares it against expected values, simplifying the diagnostic approach while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system leverages existing sensor data (exhaust gas flow, temperature, pressure) that is already being collected for other aftertreatment control purposes. This self-service approach allows the diagnostic function to utilize available information without requiring additional dedicated sensors or measurement systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If diagnostic test is continuously performed to detect catalyst malfunction, then reliability is improved, but false indications increase due to transient environmental conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst diagnosis reliabilityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of exhaust gas flow conditions (temperature, pressure, flow rate) before initiating or validating the diagnostic test. By pre-evaluating whether environmental conditions are within acceptable ranges, the system avoids performing diagnostics during transient states that would lead to false indications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors exhaust gas flow parameters and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust diagnostic test execution. When environmental conditions deviate from expected ranges, the system modifies or pauses the diagnostic test, and when conditions stabilize, it resumes or validates the test results, ensuring reliable diagnostics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If exhaust gas flow conditions are monitored to estimate reductant storage effect, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereductant storage estimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors changes in exhaust gas flow parameters (temperature, pressure, flow rate) over time to estimate reductant storage effects. By detecting parameter changes rather than maintaining continuous high-precision measurements, the system achieves accurate estimation with reduced computational energy requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs detailed monitoring and estimation only when diagnostic information is needed or when environmental conditions warrant it. During normal stable operation, the system uses simplified models or previously established baselines, reducing computational energy consumption while maintaining diagnostic capability when required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the accuracy of diagnosing catalyst malfunctions, reducing false positives and improving NOx reduction efficiency by ensuring proper operation of the SCR system.

Implementation Method 1

An SCR utilizes a reductant capable of reacting with NOx to treat the NOx. One exemplary reductant is ammonia derived from urea injection or recovered through catalytic reaction of components of the exhaust gas flow. Ammonia stored on a catalyst bed within the SCR reacts with NOx, preferably NO2, and produces favorable reactions to treat the NOx.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

Ammonia stored on a catalyst bed within the SCR reacts with NOx, preferably NO2, and produces favorable reactions to treat the NOx.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 3

It is known to operate a diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) upstream of the SCR in diesel applications to convert NO into NO2 preferable to treatment in the SCR.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 4

Lean NOx traps (NOx trap) utilize catalysts capable of storing some amount of NOx

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS8091416B2Robust design of diagnostic enabling conditions for SCR NOx conversion efficiency monitor
Publication Date: 2012.01.10 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US8091416B2 patent drawing
  • US8091416B2 patent drawing
  • US8091416B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for controlling a malfunction catalyst diagnostic test that determines a malfunction status of a catalyst within a selective catalytic reduction device includes monitoring an exhaust gas flow within an aftertreatment system, estimating an effect of the exhaust gas flow on an estimated reductant storage on a catalyst within the selective catalytic reduction device, and selectively disabling the malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon the estimating the effect of the exhaust gas flow on the estimated reductant storage.