SCR Catalyst NOx Conversion Efficiency Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current SCR systems face challenges in accurately estimating NOx conversion efficiency due to inadequate accounting for catalyst degradation, urea vaporization, and ammonia slip, leading to suboptimal NOx reduction and increased emissions.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that estimate NOx conversion efficiency by determining the SCR catalyst degradation factor, inlet NOx and NH3 concentrations, exhaust gas space velocity, and catalyst bed temperature, using sensors and chemical kinetics, to calculate a maximum NOx conversion efficiency value, which includes accounting for ammonia slip targets and catalyst outlet concentrations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If SCR systems treat injected urea as injected ammonia without accounting for vaporization and hydrolysis, then the control mechanism is simple, but ammonia can slip out the exhaust pipe causing undesirable emissions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol mechanism complexityVSAvoidammonia slip emissions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of urea injection timing and rate based on real-time NOx emissions measurements and catalyst temperature. By dynamically adjusting these parameters, the system accounts for urea vaporization and hydrolysis delays without requiring complex modeling, preventing ammonia slip while maintaining NOx reduction efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from NOx sensors and temperature sensors to continuously adjust urea dosing. The controller monitors actual NOx emissions and catalyst temperature, then modifies urea injection accordingly, creating a closed-loop control that adapts to urea vaporization delays and prevents ammonia slip

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If urea dosing is increased to ensure sufficient ammonia for NOx reduction, then NOx conversion efficiency improves, but ammonia slip increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx conversion efficiencyVSAvoidammonia slip
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static urea dosing to dynamic, real-time adjusted dosing based on actual NOx emissions and catalyst temperature. The controller continuously optimizes the balance between providing sufficient ammonia for NOx reduction and preventing excess ammonia slip, adapting to changing operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes urea dosing parameters (rate, timing, duration) based on real-time measurements. By adjusting these parameters response to actual catalyst temperature and NOx levels, the system achieves optimal NOx conversion while minimizing ammonia slip

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If urea dosing is delayed to account for slow physical dynamics, then ammonia availability is improved, but response time to NOx spikes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveammonia availabilityVSAvoidresponse time to NOx spikes
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary urea injection before NOx spikes occur, using predictive control based on engine operating conditions. By anticipating the need for ammonia and injecting urea in advance, the system ensures ammonia availability while reducing the delay effect of urea vaporization and hydrolysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic control that adjusts urea dosing timing and rate based on real-time NOx emissions and catalyst temperature. The controller optimizes the balance between early injection to ensure ammonia availability and timely response to NOx spikes, adapting to actual system conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If the SCR catalyst operates at higher temperatures to improve reaction rate, then NOx conversion efficiency improves, but ammonia storage capacity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx conversion efficiencyVSAvoidammonia storage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts urea dosing based on real-time catalyst temperature measurements. When temperature is high and storage capacity is reduced, the controller increases urea dosing to compensate. When temperature is low and storage capacity is high, the controller reduces dosing, creating a dynamic balance between NOx conversion efficiency and ammonia storage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from temperature sensors to continuously adjust urea dosing. The controller monitors catalyst temperature and modifies urea injection accordingly, compensating for temperature-induced changes in ammonia storage capacity and maintaining optimal NOx reduction efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides accurate estimation of NOx conversion efficiency, optimizing urea dosing and reducing ammonia slip, thereby enhancing NOx reduction and compliance with emissions regulations.

Implementation Method 1

SCR catalysts, including selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, are utilized to convert NOx (NO and NO2 in some fraction) to N2 and other compounds

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

SCR systems implement a reductant, typically ammonia, to reduce the NOx

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReduction: Reduction

Implementation Method 3

many systems utilize an alternate compound such as urea, which vaporizes and decomposes to ammonia in the exhaust stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVaporization: Evaporation

Implementation Method 4

urea, which vaporizes and decomposes to ammonia in the exhaust stream

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 5

Some currently available SCR systems account for the dynamics of the urea dosing and the generally fast transient nature of the internal combustion engine by utilizing the inherent ammonia storage capacity of many SCR catalyst formulations

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Data Source

PatentUS8225595B2Apparatus, system, and method for estimating an NOx conversion efficiency of a selective catalytic reduction catalyst
Publication Date: 2012.07.24 CUMMINS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INC
  • US8225595B2 patent drawing
  • US8225595B2 patent drawing
  • US8225595B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one exemplary embodiment, an apparatus is disclosed for estimating an NOx conversion efficiency of an SCR catalyst. The apparatus includes a catalyst degradation module for determining an SCR catalyst degradation factor and a NOx concentration module for determining an SCR catalyst inlet NOx concentration based on an interpretation of at least one NOx detector signal. Additionally, the apparatus includes an NH3 concentration module for determining an SCR catalyst inlet NH3 concentration, a temperature module for determining an SCR catalyst bed temperature of the at least one SCR catalyst, and a space velocity (SV) module for determining an exhaust gas SV for the SCR catalyst. A NOx conversion efficiency module calculates a NOx conversion efficiency value based at least partially on the SCR catalyst degradation factor, the SCR catalyst inlet NOx concentration, the SCR catalyst inlet NH3 concentration, the exhaust gas SV, and the SCR catalyst bed temperature.