SCR Catalyst Warm-Up Control for Cold-Start NOx Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exhaust aftertreatment systems, particularly selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems, are less effective at reducing nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions during cold operation due to insufficient catalyst temperatures, leading to increased NOx and hydrocarbon emissions that exceed regulatory standards.

Innovation Solution

A controller-based system that switches between Low Engine-Out NOx (LEON) and Thermal Management (TM) modes to balance catalyst warming and NOx reduction, using strategies like retarding fuel injection timing, increasing exhaust gas recirculation, and directing excess fuel to the aftertreatment system to minimize overall NOx emissions during cold starts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If the SCR system operates at cold temperatures, then the system can function during cold starts, but the NOx reduction efficiency is significantly diminished

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst temperatureVSAvoidNOx reduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary heating of the SCR catalyst using exhaust gas recirculation and fuel enrichment before normal operation begins. This preliminary action ensures the catalyst reaches its light-off temperature quickly, enabling effective NOx reduction to start sooner and maintain higher overall efficiency during cold operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operating parameters including increasing EGR rates, enriching the air-fuel ratio, and adjusting injection timing to optimize both catalyst heating rate and NOx production. These parameter changes allow the system to balance the conflicting requirements of warming the catalyst while limiting excessive NOx emissions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-generated harmful factors

If fuel injection timing is retarded to reduce engine-out NOx, then NOx emissions decrease, but combustion efficiency and power output are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine-out NOxVSAvoidengine power output
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts fuel injection timing based on real-time operating conditions, transitioning from retarded timing during cold start to optimal timing as the catalyst warms up. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to reduce engine-out NOx when needed while recovering power output when the SCR system becomes effective

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from temperature sensors and emissions monitoring to continuously adjust injection timing. When catalyst temperature indicates effective NOx reduction, the system advances timing to recover power; when temperatures are low, it retards timing to limit NOx production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Object-generated harmful factors

If exhaust gas recirculation is increased to lower combustion temperature and reduce NOx, then NOx formation decreases, but combustion stability and efficiency are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveNOx formationVSAvoidcombustion stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses high EGR rates as a preliminary action during cold start to suppress NOx formation while the catalyst is warming up. Once the catalyst reaches operating temperature, the system reduces EGR rates to restore combustion stability and efficiency, having already established low NOx emissions during the critical warm-up period

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces NOx emissions during cold operation by optimizing catalyst warming and NOx conversion efficiency, ensuring compliance with emissions regulations by minimizing the overall NOx burden.

Implementation Method 1

A common component in many of these exhaust aftertreatment systems is a selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system, which reduces nitrous oxide (NOx) present in the exhaust gas by injecting a reductant into the flow of exhaust combined with the exhaust gas interacting with a catalyst. The catalyst reacts with the exhaust gas to form harmless nitrogen and water.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

However, the SCR is most effective at elevated operating temperatures, which means that its efficacy at colder temperatures is diminished.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal activation: Heating

Data Source

PatentUS12421910B2Systems and methods for cold operation NOx burden reduction
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 CUMMINS INC
  • US12421910B2 patent drawing
  • US12421910B2 patent drawing
  • US12421910B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes initiating a low engine-out NOx (LEON) mode by controlling a component of a vehicle having an aftertreatment system to decrease an instantaneous engine-out NOx (EONOx) amount. The method also includes comparing a temperature of the aftertreatment system to a threshold temperature. The method also includes responsive to determining that the temperature of the aftertreatment system exceeds the threshold temperature, disengaging the LEON mode. The method also includes responsive to determining that the temperature of the aftertreatment system is below the threshold temperature, comparing a NOx value to a NOx value threshold. The method also includes disengaging the LEON mode responsive to determining that the NOx value exceeds the NOx value threshold.