SCR System Efficiency Estimation via Injection and Loading Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current selective catalytic reduction systems for internal combustion engines face imprecision in estimating nitrogen oxides conversion efficiency, leading to insufficient or excessive ammonia injection, which fails to meet stringent future emission standards and results in increased carbon dioxide emissions.

Innovation Solution

A method that estimates the total efficiency of the SCR system by modeling the efficiency of two reactions: one between newly injected reducing agent and nitrogen oxides upstream of the catalyst, and another between remaining nitrogen oxides and stored reducing agent, taking into account environmental conditions and catalyst aging, without requiring hardware modifications, only software adaptations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional efficiency estimation methods are used, then current emission standards can be met, but future stringent emission standards cannot be complied with due to imprecision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency estimation precisionVSAvoidcompliance with emission standards
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The efficiency estimation is segmented into two distinct components: efficiency due to injection (reacting newly injected reducing agent with nitrogen oxides) and efficiency due to loading (reacting stored reducing agent with remaining nitrogen oxides). This segmentation allows each component to be modeled separately with appropriate parameters, improving overall estimation precision and enabling compliance with future stringent emission standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Object-generated harmful factors

If insufficient reducing agent is injected due to underestimated efficiency, then ammonia desorption is avoided, but the full conversion potential of the system is not exploited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveammonia desorptionVSAvoidconversion potential
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a feedback mechanism where the estimated total efficiency (combining injection and loading efficiencies) continuously informs the reducing agent injection quantity calculation. This ensures that the injection amount is precisely matched to the actual conversion needs, avoiding both ammonia desorption from over-injection and unexploited conversion potential from under-injection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If too much reducing agent is injected due to overestimated efficiency, then full conversion potential is exploited, but ammonia desorption occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion potentialVSAvoidammonia desorption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameters used for efficiency estimation by incorporating multiple influencing factors including reducing agent loading, catalyst temperature, nitrogen dioxide ratio, hourly volumetric speed, and system aging. These parameter changes enable more accurate efficiency estimation, ensuring optimal reducing agent injection that exploits full conversion potential without causing ammonia desorption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If hardware modifications are made to improve precision, then emission standards compliance improves, but implementation cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency estimation precisionVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces potential hardware modifications with a software-based solution. By implementing a refined efficiency estimation algorithm in the engine computer that models both injection and loading efficiencies with multiple parameters, the system achieves superior precision without any physical hardware changes, thereby avoiding increased implementation costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the precision of nitrogen oxides conversion efficiency, achieving a higher maximum attainable efficiency and significantly reducing carbon dioxide emissions while maintaining compliance with stringent emission standards at a lower implementation cost.

Implementation Method 1

selective catalytic reduction systems, also called SCR systems, aim to reduce the nitrogen oxides (NOx) contained in the exhaust gases. SCR systems implement a chemical reaction between nitrogen oxides and a reducing agent conventionally taking the form of ammonia.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSelective catalytic reduction: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

through another chemical species (a precursor), such as urea which decomposes into ammonia and carbon dioxide under the effect of heat.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Data Source

PatentEP2944778B1Method for controlling the polluting emissions of an internal combustion engine
Publication Date: 2017.03.01 PSA AUTOMOBILES SA
  • EP2944778B1 patent drawing
  • EP2944778B1 patent drawing
  • EP2944778B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates primarily to a method for controlling a catalytic selective reduction system for treating nitrogen oxides (NOx) present in the exhaust line of an internal combustion engine. The system comprises means for introducing a reducing agent into the exhaust line upstream of a nitrogen oxide reduction catalyst. The method is characterized in that it includes a step for estimating the system's efficiency, referred to as the total efficiency (EffTot), based on a model (100) of the efficiency of a first reaction, referred to as the injection efficiency (Efflnj), between a newly injected quantity of reducing agent and nitrogen oxides present upstream of the catalyst, and a model (101) of the efficiency of a second reaction, referred to as the loading efficiency (EffLd), between nitrogen oxides remaining after the first reaction and a quantity of reducing agent stored in the catalyst.