SCR ESD Protection Guard Region Delay Triggering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ESD protection solutions for integrated circuit (IC) devices face challenges in achieving high snapback holding voltage while maintaining low trigger voltage and minimizing physical space and manufacturing costs, often leading to latch-up conditions and damage during ESD events.

Innovation Solution

A silicon controlled rectifier (SCR) circuit with an active guard-ring configuration, utilizing a resistive-capacitive (RC) trigger circuit and a guard region to delay triggering and increase holding voltage, while maintaining low on-resistance and minimal size impact, effectively shunting ESD current from a node to a reference voltage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conventional ESD protection circuit is used, then ESD current can be shunted, but the snapback holding voltage is limited and latch-up conditions may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveESD protection effectivenessVSAvoidlatch-up conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The ESD protection function is segmented into two distinct operational phases: a delay phase where the guard region impedes current flow to prevent premature triggering, and a discharge phase where the SCR circuit activates to shunt ESD current. This segmentation allows the circuit to achieve both high holding voltage (during delay) and effective current shunting (during discharge), resolving the contradiction between protection effectiveness and latch-up prevention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The guard region is configured to preliminarily impede current flow in the second region before the SCR circuit triggers. This preliminary action delays the triggering of the SCR, ensuring that the circuit maintains its holding voltage capability while preparing for ESD discharge. The delay mechanism prevents premature activation that could lead to latch-up conditions, while still enabling effective protection when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If the SCR circuit is triggered quickly to shunt ESD current, then protection is provided, but the holding voltage decreases and latch-up risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveESD current shunting speedVSAvoidsnapback holding voltage
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The guard region performs a preliminary impeding action that delays SCR triggering. This delay is not a drawback but a deliberate design feature that allows the circuit to maintain high holding voltage during the critical transition period. Once the delay period expires and ESD current exceeds the holding voltage threshold, the SCR triggers rapidly to shunt the current, thus achieving both high holding voltage and fast protection response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The guard region acts as a cushioning mechanism that temporarily absorbs or delays the ESD current before it reaches the SCR triggering threshold. This beforehand cushioning prevents premature triggering that would reduce holding voltage, while still enabling fast current shunting once the cushioning effect expires and the ESD event is confirmed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Strength

If the guard region impedes current flow to delay SCR triggering, then holding voltage increases, but current shunting is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesnapback holding voltageVSAvoidtriggering delay
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The guard region's current impeding action is a preliminary step that must occur before the SCR can trigger. This preliminary action is designed with a specific delay characteristic that balances two requirements: maintaining high holding voltage during normal operation and enabling fast protection response when ESD occurs. The delay is optimized to be sufficiently long to maintain holding voltage but short enough to provide timely protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The guard region dynamically adjusts its current impeding characteristic based on the ESD event severity. During normal operation, it maintains high impedance to preserve holding voltage. During an ESD event, when current exceeds the holding voltage threshold, the guard region's effect diminishes and the SCR triggers rapidly. This dynamic behavior resolves the contradiction by making the delay adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Area of stationary object

If ESD protection circuit area is reduced to minimize chip space, then manufacturing cost decreases, but ESD protection capability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechip spaceVSAvoidESD protection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The guard region and SCR circuit are merged into a single integrated structure where the guard region is formed within the same fabrication process as the SCR transistor regions. This merging allows the ESD protection function to be achieved without adding separate discrete components, thus minimizing chip space while maintaining full protection capability including high holding voltage and fast response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The guard region serves multiple functions: it delays SCR triggering to maintain holding voltage, it defines the ESD protection activation threshold, and it works in conjunction with the SCR circuit to provide rapid current shunting. This multi-functionality allows a single structure to achieve comprehensive ESD protection without requiring additional dedicated components, thus optimizing chip space utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The SCR circuit with a guard region achieves a high snapback holding voltage and low trigger voltage, reducing the risk of latch-up conditions and damage, while maintaining efficient current shunting and minimal size and cost impact, thus enhancing ESD protection for IC devices.

Implementation Method 1

A guard region is configured and arranged to delay triggering of the SCR circuit in response to an ESD event by impeding current flow in the second region

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrostatic repulsion: Ion Repulsion/Attraction

Data Source

PatentUS10020299B2Electrostatic discharge protection using a guard region
Publication Date: 2018.07.10 NXP BV
  • US10020299B2 patent drawing
  • US10020299B2 patent drawing
  • US10020299B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A silicon controlled rectifier (SCR) circuit is configured to shunt electrostatic discharge (ESD) current from a node to a reference voltage. The SCR circuit includes a first bipolar PNP transistor having a first emitter connected to the node, a first base, and a first collector. A second bipolar NPN transistor has a second collector sharing a first region with the first base, a second base sharing a second region with the first collector, and an emitter electrically connected to the reference voltage. A guard region is configured and arranged to delay triggering of the SCR circuit in response to an ESD event by impeding current flow in the second region.